Dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction in women seeking fertility treatment

To compare rates of dyspareunia in infertile women and healthy controls. Secondary aims are to determine whether demographic characteristics, rates of sexual dysfunction, and baseline depression status differ between the two groups. A case-control study. University-based faculty fertility and OB/GYN...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 98; no. 6; pp. 1544 - 1548.e2
Main Authors Furukawa, Abby P., Patton, Phillip E., Amato, Paula, Li, Hong, Leclair, Catherine M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.12.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare rates of dyspareunia in infertile women and healthy controls. Secondary aims are to determine whether demographic characteristics, rates of sexual dysfunction, and baseline depression status differ between the two groups. A case-control study. University-based faculty fertility and OB/GYN generalist clinics. Seventy-five infertile female subjects presenting to the infertility clinic and 210 women presenting to the generalist clinic for their annual exam. Completion of an anonymous survey including demographic information, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Patient-Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and original questions regarding sexual pain. Rate of dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction. There were no significant differences in rates of dyspareunia (37.6% controls vs. 30.7% study) or the rate of sexual dysfunction (31.9% controls vs. 37.3% study). Infertile women had more frequent intercourse than controls and were more likely to be married. There were otherwise no differences in baseline rates of depression, demographic characteristics, or individual domain scores of the FSFI. Women seeking fertility treatment had similar rates of dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction compared with controls.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.011
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.011