Converting endangered species categories to probabilities of extinction for phylogenetic conservation prioritization

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 3; no. 11; p. e3700
• Main Authors: Mooers, Arne Ø, Faith, Daniel P, Maddison, Wayne P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 11.11.2008; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Biodiversity; Biological evolution; Categories; Combinatorics; Computer simulation; Conservation; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods; Conversion; Converting; Databases, Factual; Ecology/Community Ecology and Biodiversity; Endangered & extinct species; Endangered species; Evolutionary Biology; Evolutionary Biology/Bioinformatics; Extinction; Extinction (Biology); Extinction, Biological; Lists; Museums; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Probability; Protection and preservation; Sensitivity analysis; Simulation; Species extinction; Species Specificity; Stability; Studies; Transformation; Trees - physiology; Wildlife conservation; Vancouver British Columbia Canada; Canada; Germany
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003700

Categories of imperilment like the global IUCN Red List have been transformed to probabilities of extinction and used to rank species by the amount of imperiled evolutionary history they represent (e.g. by the Edge of Existence programme). We investigate the stability of such lists when ranks are converted to probabilities of extinction under different scenarios. Using a simple example and computer simulation, we show that preserving the categories when converting such list designations to probabilities of extinction does not guarantee the stability of the resulting lists. Care must be taken when choosing a suitable transformation, especially if conservation dollars are allocated to species in a ranked fashion. We advocate routine sensitivity analyses.