Rumen sampling methods bias bacterial communities observed

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 5; p. e0258176
• Main Authors: Hagey, Jill V, Laabs, Maia, Maga, Elizabeth A, DePeters, Edward J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 05.05.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Abundance; Analysis; Animal Feed - analysis; Animals; Archaea - genetics; Bacteria; Bacteria - genetics; Bias; Biology and Life Sciences; Cannulae; Cannulation; Cattle; Community composition; Diet - veterinary; Ecosystem; Environmental impact; Evaluation; Feces; Feed efficiency; Feeds; Female; Fistula; Food contamination & poisoning; Genes; Genetic aspects; Lachnospiraceae; Liquid phases; Medicine and Health Sciences; Microbiota; Particulate matter; Physical Sciences; Plastics; Properties; Relative abundance; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics; rRNA 16S; Rumen; Rumen - microbiology; Sampling; Sampling methods; Selection bias; Stomach; United States
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258176

The rumen is a complex ecosystem that plays a critical role in our efforts to improve feed efficiency of cattle and reduce their environmental impacts. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene provides a powerful tool to survey the bacterial and some archaeal. Oral stomach tubing a cow to collect a rumen sample is a rapid, cost-effective alternative to rumen cannulation for acquiring rumen samples. In this study, we determined how sampling method (oral stomach tubing vs cannulated grab sample), as well as rumen fraction type (liquid vs solid), bias the bacterial and archaeal communities observed. Liquid samples were further divided into liquid strained through cheesecloth and unstrained. Fecal samples were also collected to determine how these differed from the rumen sample types. The abundance of major archaeal communities was not different at the family level in samples acquired via rumen cannula or stomach tube. In contrast to the stable archaeal communities across sample type, the bacterial order WCHB1-41 (phylum Kiritimatiellaeota) was enriched in both liquid strained and unstrained samples as well as the family Prevotellaceae as compared to grab samples. However, these liquid samples had significantly lower abundance of Lachnospiraceae compared with grab samples. Solid samples strained of rumen liquid most closely resembled the grab samples containing both rumen liquid and solid particles obtained directly from the rumen cannula; therefore, inclusion of particulate matter is important for an accurate representation of the rumen bacteria. Stomach tube samples were the most variable and were most representative of the liquid phase. In comparison with a grab sample, stomach tube samples had significantly lower abundance of Lachnospiraceae, Fibrobacter and Treponema. Fecal samples did not reflect the community composition of the rumen, as fecal samples had significantly higher relative abundance of Ruminococcaceae and significantly lower relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae compared with grab samples.