A phase I dose escalation trial of vaccine replicon particles (VRP) expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in subjects with prostate cancer

► The alphavirus-based replicon vaccine strategy has advantages over other vaccines. ► PSMA-VRP is a propagation defective, viral replicon vector system encoding PSMA. ► A phase I first in human study of PSMA VRP in prostate cancer was safe. ► All subjects had immunologic competence noted by respons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVaccine Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 943 - 949
Main Authors Slovin, Susan F., Kehoe, Marissa, Durso, Robert, Fernandez, Celina, Olson, William, Gao, Jian P., Israel, Robert, Scher, Howard I., Morris, Stephen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 30.01.2013
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
VEE
VRP
VRP
VEE
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► The alphavirus-based replicon vaccine strategy has advantages over other vaccines. ► PSMA-VRP is a propagation defective, viral replicon vector system encoding PSMA. ► A phase I first in human study of PSMA VRP in prostate cancer was safe. ► All subjects had immunologic competence noted by responses to standard mitogens. ► No cellular responses to PSMA was seen; few patients had a humoral response to PSMA. PSMA-VRP is a propagation defective, viral replicon vector system encoding PSMA under phase I evaluation for patients with castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC). The product is derived from an attenuated strain of the alphavirus, Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (VEE) virus, and incorporates multiple redundant safety features. In this first in human trial, two cohorts of 3 patients with CRPC metastatic to bone were treated with up to five doses of either 0.9×107IU or 0.36×108IU of PSMA-VRP at weeks 1, 4, 7, 10 and 18, followed by an expansion cohort of 6 patients treated with 0.36×108IU of PSMA-VRP at weeks 1, 4, 7, 10 and 18. No toxicities were observed. In the first dose cohort, no PSMA specific cellular immune responses were seen but weak PSMA-specific signals were observed by ELISA. The remaining 9 patients, which included the higher cohort and the extension cohort, had no PSMA specific cellular responses. PSMA-VRP was well-tolerated at both doses. While there did not appear to be clinical benefit nor robust immune signals at the two doses studied, neutralizing antibodies were produced by both cohorts suggesting that dosing was suboptimal.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.096
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.096