Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in 121 Patients Who Underwent Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Implantation　― Early Results From a Single Korean Institution

• Published in: Circulation Journal Vol. 85; no. 7; pp. 1011 - 1017
• Main Authors: Kim, Do Jung, Lee, Sak, Joo, Hyun-Chel, Youn, Young-Nam, Yoo, Kyung-Jong, Lee, Seung Hyun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan The Japanese Circulation Society 25.06.2021
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic valve; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging; Aortic Valve - surgery; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery; Bioprosthesis; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemodynamics; Humans; Male; Pacemaker implantation; Perceval valve; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Sutureless aortic valve replacement; Treatment Outcome; Republic of Korea; Pacemaker implantation; Aortic valve; Sutureless aortic valve replacement; Perceval valve
• ISSN: 1346-9843; 1347-4820; 1347-4820
• DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0023

Background:This study aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of Perceval sutureless valves in the Korean population and to introduce a modified technique of guiding suture placement during valve deployment.Methods and Results:From December 2014 to April 2019, 121 patients (mean age: 74.7±6.2 years; 53.7% female) received a Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement. To prevent conduction system injury, the depth of guiding suture placement (1 mm below the nadir of the annulus) was modified. All patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation at discharge and 6–12 months postoperatively, with a mean follow up of 13.7±11.2 months. Concomitant surgeries, such as coronary artery bypass grafting, and other valvular surgeries, were performed in 45.5% of cases. The mean aortic cross-clamp times for isolated and minimal procedures were 32.8±7.9, and 41.2±8.0 min, respectively. The overall transvalvular mean gradients were 13.1±3.8 mmHg at discharge and 11.5±4.7 mmHg at the last follow up. After modifying the guiding suture placement, permanent pacemaker implantation risk decreased from 9.9% to 2.5%. Cardiac-related mortality was 0.8%, with no patient developing valvular or paravalvular aortic regurgitation, valve thrombosis, or endocarditis.Conclusions:Perceval valve implantation provided a significant cardiac-related survival benefit with excellent early hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to determine whether adjusting the implantation depth, such as modification of the guiding suture technique, can reduce the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation.