Handwritten online signature verification and Forgery Detection for Online Handwritten Signature using Hybrid Wavelet Transform-1 with HMM classifier

• Published in: Journal of Electrical Systems Vol. 20; no. 4s; pp. 2471 - 2478
• Main Authors: Chavan, Manoj, Thakur, Rashmi, Ghosh, Sanjeev, Bharadi, Vinayak, Kasturiwale, Hemant, Mishra, Sangeeta
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Engineering and Scientific Research Groups 08.04.2024
• Subjects: Digital signatures; Ergodic processes; Feature extraction; Forgery; Handwriting; Markov chains; Rejection rate; Signal analysis; Signatures; Verification; Wavelet transforms
• ISSN: 1112-5209
• DOI: 10.52783/jes.2800

Online signature verification employs a distinctive biometric trait by utilizing both static and dynamic features extracted from 2D signature images. A hybrid wavelet transform, denoted as HWT-1 with a size of 256, is formed through the Kronecker product of two orthogonal transforms, such as DCT, DHT, Haar, Hadamard, and Kekre, each with sizes 4 and 64. This HWT facilitates signal analysis at both global and local levels, akin to traditional wavelet transforms. Specifically, HWT-1 processes the 256 samples of online handwritten signatures, yielding 128 samples that constitute the feature vectors for signature verification and forgery detection. These feature vectors are then inputted into the Left-Right and Ergodic Hidden Markov Model (HMM) classifiers for further analysis. The HMMs are trained using 10 randomly selected genuine signature samples and subsequently tested with the remaining 10 genuine signatures and 20 forged signatures from the SVC 2004 signature database, repeating this process 20 times to compute average values. Among all possible combinations of HWT-1 utilizing DCT, DHT, Haar, Hadamard, and Kekre transforms for the Left-Right HMM model, the combination of DCT 4 and Haar 64 demonstrates the best performance with a False Rejection Rate (FRR) and False Acceptance Rate (FAR) of 1.05% and 0.99%, respectively, at state 3. Similarly, considering all feasible combinations of HWT-1 for the Ergodic HMM model, the combination of DCT 4 and Kekre 64 yields the optimal performance with an FRR and FAR of 1.24% and 1.33%, respectively, at state 3.