Compensatory Water Effects Link Yearly Global Land CO2 Sink Changes to Temperature

• Published in: Nature (London) Vol. 541; no. 7638; pp. 516 - 520
• Main Authors: Jung, Martin, Reichstein, Markus, Tramontana, Gianluca, Viovy, Nicolas, Schwalm, Christopher R., Wang, Ying-Ping, Weber, Ulrich, Zaehle, Soenke, Zeng, Ning, Huntingford, Chris, Sitch, Stephen, Gans, Fabian, Ahlstroem, Anders, Arneth, Almut, Camps-Valls, Gustau, Ciais, Philippe, Friedlingstein, Pierre, Ichii, Kazuhito, Jain, Atul K., Kato, Etsushi, Papale, Dario, Poulter, Benjamin, Raduly, Botond, Roedenbeck, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Goddard Space Flight Center Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature 26.01.2017; Nature Publishing Group UK; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 639/705/1046; 704/47/4113; Algorithms; Carbon; Carbon cycle; Carbon dioxide; Compensation; Ecosystems; Environmental aspects; Environmental Sciences; Geophysics; Humanities and Social Sciences; letter; multidisciplinary; Photosynthesis; Physics; Respiration; Science; Simulation; Temperature effects; Water availability; Water-supply
• ISSN: 0028-0836; 1476-4687
• DOI: 10.1038/nature20780

Large interannual variations in the measured growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) originate primarily from fluctuations in carbon uptake by land ecosystems13. It remains uncertain, however, to what extent temperature and water availability control the carbon balance of land ecosystems across spatial and temporal scales314. Here we use empirical models based on eddy covariance data15 and process-based models16,17 to investigate the effect of changes in temperature and water availability on gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) at local and global scales. We find that water availability is the dominant driver of the local interannual variability in GPP and TER. To a lesser extent this is true also for NEE at the local scale, but when integrated globally, temporal NEE variability is mostly driven by temperature fluctuations. We suggest that this apparent paradox can be explained by two compensatory water effects. Temporal water-driven GPP and TER variations compensate locally, dampening water-driven NEE variability. Spatial water availability anomalies also compensate, leaving a dominant temperature signal in the year-to-year fluctuations of the land carbon sink. These findings help to reconcile seemingly contradictory reports regarding the importance of temperature and water in controlling the interannual variability of the terrestrial carbon balance36,9,11,12,14. Our study indicates that spatial climate covariation drives the global carbon cycle response.