Combining multiple functional annotation tools increases coverage of metabolic annotation
Genome-scale metabolic modeling is a cornerstone of systems biology analysis of microbial organisms and communities, yet these genome-scale modeling efforts are invariably based on incomplete functional annotations. Annotated genomes typically contain 30-50% of genes without functional annotation, s...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC genomics Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 948 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
19.12.2018
BioMed Central Springer BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Genome-scale metabolic modeling is a cornerstone of systems biology analysis of microbial organisms and communities, yet these genome-scale modeling efforts are invariably based on incomplete functional annotations. Annotated genomes typically contain 30-50% of genes without functional annotation, severely limiting our knowledge of the "parts lists" that the organisms have at their disposal. These incomplete annotations may be sufficient to derive a model of a core set of well-studied metabolic pathways that support growth in pure culture. However, pathways important for growth on unusual metabolites exchanged in complex microbial communities are often less understood, resulting in missing functional annotations in newly sequenced genomes.
Here, we present results on a comprehensive reannotation of 27 bacterial reference genomes, focusing on enzymes with EC numbers annotated by KEGG, RAST, EFICAz, and the BRENDA enzyme database, and on membrane transport annotations by TransportDB, KEGG and RAST. Our analysis shows that annotation using multiple tools can result in a drastically larger metabolic network reconstruction, adding on average 40% more EC numbers, 3-8 times more substrate-specific transporters, and 37% more metabolic genes. These results are even more pronounced for bacterial species that are phylogenetically distant from well-studied model organisms such as E. coli.
Metabolic annotations are often incomplete and inconsistent. Combining multiple functional annotation tools can greatly improve genome coverage and metabolic network size, especially for non-model organisms and non-core pathways. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 AC52-07NA27344 LLNL-JRNL-750275 USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER) (SC-23) USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) |
ISSN: | 1471-2164 1471-2164 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12864-018-5221-9 |