Comparative sensitizing potencies of fragrances, preservatives, and hair dyes

Summary The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is used for assessing sensitizing potential in hazard identification and risk assessment for regulatory purposes. Sensitizing potency on the basis of the LLNA is categorized into extreme (EC3 value of ≤0.2%), strong (>0.2% to ≤2%), and moderate (>2%)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContact dermatitis Vol. 75; no. 5; pp. 265 - 275
Main Authors Lidén, Carola, Yazar, Kerem, Johansen, Jeanne D., Karlberg, Ann-Therese, Uter, Wolfgang, White, Ian R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is used for assessing sensitizing potential in hazard identification and risk assessment for regulatory purposes. Sensitizing potency on the basis of the LLNA is categorized into extreme (EC3 value of ≤0.2%), strong (>0.2% to ≤2%), and moderate (>2%). To compare the sensitizing potencies of fragrance substances, preservatives, and hair dye substances, which are skin sensitizers that frequently come into contact with the skin of consumers and workers, LLNA results and EC3 values for 72 fragrance substances, 25 preservatives and 107 hair dye substances were obtained from two published compilations of LLNA data and opinions by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety and its predecessors. The median EC3 values of fragrances (n = 61), preservatives (n = 19) and hair dyes (n = 59) were 5.9%, 0.9%, and 1.3%, respectively. The majority of sensitizing preservatives and hair dyes are thus strong or extreme sensitizers (EC3 value of ≤2%), and fragrances are mostly moderate sensitizers. Although fragrances are typically moderate sensitizers, they are among the most frequent causes of contact allergy. This indicates that factors other than potency need to be addressed more rigorously in risk assessment and risk management.
Bibliography:ArticleID:COD12683
Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE)
ark:/67375/WNG-4JPDQWV4-T
istex:F9CF3DB973D41CF0A41A7F2DCBEF37AA26E6F8F5
Appendix S1. Conversion of EC3 values. Table S1. Opinions by the SCCS and its predecessors. Detailed information on the publication numbers of the most recent opinions that mention the EC3 values in Tables 2-4, and other SCCS opinions and memoranda.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0105-1873
1600-0536
1600-0536
DOI:10.1111/cod.12683