Paired-Duplication Signatures Mark Cryptic Inversions and Other Complex Structural Variation

• Published in: American journal of human genetics Vol. 97; no. 1; pp. 170 - 176
• Main Authors: Brand, Harrison, Collins, Ryan L., Hanscom, Carrie, Rosenfeld, Jill A., Pillalamarri, Vamsee, Stone, Matthew R., Kelley, Fontina, Mason, Tamara, Margolin, Lauren, Eggert, Stacey, Mitchell, Elyse, Hodge, Jennelle C., Gusella, James F., Sanders, Stephan J., Talkowski, Michael E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 02.07.2015; Cell Press; Elsevier
• Subjects: Autism; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive - genetics; Chromosome Inversion - genetics; Chromosomes; Cohort Studies; DNA Copy Number Variations - genetics; DNA Repair - genetics; Gene Library; Genetic Markers - genetics; Genetic testing; Genomes; Humans; Segmental Duplications, Genomic - genetics
• ISSN: 0002-9297; 1537-6605; 1537-6605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.012

Copy-number variants (CNVs) have been the predominant focus of genetic studies of structural variation, and chromosomal microarray (CMA) for genome-wide CNV detection is the recommended first-tier genetic diagnostic screen in neurodevelopmental disorders. We compared CNVs observed by CMA to the structural variation detected by whole-genome large-insert sequencing in 259 individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from the Simons Simplex Collection. These analyses revealed a diverse landscape of complex duplications in the human genome. One remarkably common class of complex rearrangement, which we term dupINVdup, involves two closely located duplications (“paired duplications”) that flank the breakpoints of an inversion. This complex variant class is cryptic to CMA, but we observed it in 8.1% of all subjects. We also detected other paired-duplication signatures and duplication-mediated complex rearrangements in 15.8% of all ASD subjects. Breakpoint analysis showed that the predominant mechanism of formation of these complex duplication-associated variants was microhomology-mediated repair. On the basis of the striking prevalence of dupINVdups in this cohort, we explored the landscape of all inversion variation among the 235 highest-quality libraries and found abundant complexity among these variants: only 39.3% of inversions were canonical, or simple, inversions without additional rearrangement. Collectively, these findings indicate that dupINVdups, as well as other complex duplication-associated rearrangements, represent relatively common sources of genomic variation that is cryptic to population-based microarray and low-depth whole-genome sequencing. They also suggest that paired-duplication signatures detected by CMA warrant further scrutiny in genetic diagnostic testing given that they might mark complex rearrangements of potential clinical relevance.