Psychometric Evaluation and External Validity of the Japanese Version of Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index

• Published in: Spine Surgery and Related Research Vol. 6; no. 6; pp. 696 - 703
• Main Authors: Takami, Masanari, Kawakami, Mamoru, Hashizume, Hiroshi, Tsutsui, Shunji, Oka, Hiroyuki, Shinozaki, Tomohiro, Iwasaki, Hiroshi, Yamada, Hiroshi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 27.11.2022
• Subjects: adult spinal deformity; external validity; Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; lumbar range of motion; lumbar stiffness; Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index; Original; Oswestry Disability Index; psychometric evaluation; Oswestry Disability Index; adult spinal deformity; Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index; psychometric evaluation; lumbar range of motion; Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; external validity; lumbar stiffness
• ISSN: 2432-261X; 2432-261X
• DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0066

Introduction: Long fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity may restrict activities of daily living due to lumbar stiffness. While the Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) can help assess lumbar stiffness, in Asia the external validity of this questionnaire has not been sufficiently examined. We performed the psychometric evaluation and external validation of the Japanese version of the LSDI (LSDI-J).Methods: Fifty consecutive patients (14 males and 36 females; mean age 70.6 years) who underwent lumbar fusion surgery at our institution a minimum of one year after surgery and who visited the outpatient clinic between April and May 2019, were surveyed using the LSDI-J. The mean number of fusion levels was 4.4. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were calculated for internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate reliability. External validity was assessed by comparisons with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), and the lumbar range of motion (LROM) with LSDI-J scores.Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.652 overall, and 0.849 after excluding Question 10 due to a low response rate. The ICC was 0.824 overall and 0.851 after excluding Question 10. The correlation with the ODI was 0.684, and the correlation coefficients with each domain of the JOABPEQ ranged from −0.590 to −0.413, indicating moderate correlation. However, LROM and the LSDI-J were not correlated (r=−0.055, P=0.734).Conclusions: The LSDI-J may not be suitable in Japan because there was no correlation with LROM, the most important factor for external validity. It may be necessary to investigate why the LSDI-J did not apply to the Japanese population in terms of lower limb function. Alternatively, a unique method may be needed to assess lumbar stiffness disability that is more suitable for actual clinical practice in Japan.