Glaucoma classification based on scanning laser ophthalmoscopic images using a deep learning ensemble method
This study aimed to assess the utility of optic nerve head ( onh ) en-face images, captured with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ( slo ) during standard optical coherence tomography ( oct ) imaging of the posterior segment, and demonstrate the potential of deep learning ( dl ) ensemble method that ope...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 16; no. 6; p. e0252339 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
San Francisco, CA USA
Public Library of Science
04.06.2021
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0252339 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study aimed to assess the utility of optic nerve head (
onh
) en-face images, captured with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (
slo
) during standard optical coherence tomography (
oct
) imaging of the posterior segment, and demonstrate the potential of deep learning (
dl
) ensemble method that operates in a low data regime to differentiate glaucoma patients from healthy controls. The two groups of subjects were initially categorized based on a range of clinical tests including measurements of intraocular pressure, visual fields,
oct
derived retinal nerve fiber layer (
rnfl
) thickness and dilated stereoscopic examination of
onh
. 227
slo
images of 227 subjects (105 glaucoma patients and 122 controls) were used. A new task-specific convolutional neural network architecture was developed for
slo
image-based classification. To benchmark the results of the proposed method, a range of classifiers were tested including five machine learning methods to classify glaucoma based on
rnfl
thickness—a well-known biomarker in glaucoma diagnostics, ensemble classifier based on inception v3 architecture, and classifiers based on features extracted from the image. The study shows that cross-validation
dl
ensemble based on
slo
images achieved a good discrimination performance with up to 0.962 of balanced accuracy, outperforming all of the other tested classifiers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0252339 |