Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis
We measured the expression pattern and analyzed codon usage in 8,133, 1,550, and 2,917 genes, respectively, from Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Arabidopsis thaliana. In those three species, we observed a clear correlation between codon usage and gene expression levels and showe...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 96; no. 8; pp. 4482 - 4487 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
13.04.1999
National Acad Sciences National Academy of Sciences The National Academy of Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We measured the expression pattern and analyzed codon usage in 8,133, 1,550, and 2,917 genes, respectively, from Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Arabidopsis thaliana. In those three species, we observed a clear correlation between codon usage and gene expression levels and showed that this correlation is not due to a mutational bias. This provides direct evidence for selection on silent sites in those three distantly related multicellular eukaryotes. Surprisingly, there is a strong negative correlation between codon usage and protein length. This effect is not due to a smaller size of highly expressed proteins. Thus, for a same-expression pattern, the selective pressure on codon usage appears to be lower in genes encoding long rather than short proteins. This puzzling observation is not predicted by any of the current models of selection on codon usage and thus raises the question of how translation efficiency affects fitness in multicellular organisms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 Edited by Samuel Karlin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved February 2, 1999 |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4482 |