Molecular biomarker testing for non–small cell lung cancer: consensus statement of the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group

Molecular biomarker testing is the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In 2017, the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group and the Korean Molecular Pathology Study Group co-published a molecular testing guideline which contained almost all known genetic changes th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Pathology and Translational Medicine Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 181 - 191
Main Authors Chang, Sunhee, Shim, Hyo Sup, Kim, Tae Jung, Choi, Yoon-La, Kim, Wan Seop, Shin, Dong Hoon, Kim, Lucia, Park, Heae Surng, Lee, Geon Kook, Lee, Chang Hun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Society of Pathologists and The Korean Society for Cytopathology 01.05.2021
Korean Society of Pathologists, Korean Society for Cytopathology
The Korean Society of Pathologists and the Korean Society for Cytopathology
Korean Society of Pathologists & the Korean Society for Cytopathology
대한병리학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2383-7837
2383-7845
DOI10.4132/jptm.2021.03.23

Cover

More Information
Summary:Molecular biomarker testing is the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In 2017, the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group and the Korean Molecular Pathology Study Group co-published a molecular testing guideline which contained almost all known genetic changes that aid in treatment decisions or predict prognosis in patients with NSCLC. Since then there have been significant changes in targeted therapies as well as molecular testing including newly approved targeted drugs and liquid biopsy. In order to reflect these changes, the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group developed a consensus statement on molecular biomarker testing. This consensus statement was crafted to provide guidance on what genes should be tested, as well as methodology, samples, patient selection, reporting and quality control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2383-7837
2383-7845
DOI:10.4132/jptm.2021.03.23