拉莫三嗪添加治疗癫合并抑郁障碍的Meta分析
目的对拉莫三嗪添加治疗癫合并抑郁障碍的疗效进行系统评价。方法以拉莫三嗪(lamotrigine)、癫痫(epilepsy)、抑郁(depressive)等中英文词汇,计算机检索1998年1月-2014年6月美国国立医学图书馆生物医学信息检索系统、Cochrane临床对照试验中心注册库、中国知网中国知识基础设施工程、万方数据库等关于拉莫三嗪添加治疗癫合并抑郁障碍的临床研究,分别以Cochrane系统评价手册5.0.2随机对照试验质量评价标准和Rev Man 5.1.1统计软件行文献质量评价和Meta分析。结果经剔除重复和不符合纳入标准文献,48篇文献中最终仅纳入3项临床试验共668例癫合...
Saved in:
Published in | 中国现代神经疾病杂志 Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 23 - 29 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Chinese |
Published |
300052,天津医科大学总医院神经内科%300052,天津医科大学总医院保健医疗部
2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1672-6731 |
DOI | 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2016.01.005 |
Cover
Summary: | 目的对拉莫三嗪添加治疗癫合并抑郁障碍的疗效进行系统评价。方法以拉莫三嗪(lamotrigine)、癫痫(epilepsy)、抑郁(depressive)等中英文词汇,计算机检索1998年1月-2014年6月美国国立医学图书馆生物医学信息检索系统、Cochrane临床对照试验中心注册库、中国知网中国知识基础设施工程、万方数据库等关于拉莫三嗪添加治疗癫合并抑郁障碍的临床研究,分别以Cochrane系统评价手册5.0.2随机对照试验质量评价标准和Rev Man 5.1.1统计软件行文献质量评价和Meta分析。结果经剔除重复和不符合纳入标准文献,48篇文献中最终仅纳入3项临床试验共668例癫合并抑郁障碍患者。Meta分析显示:拉莫三嗪组患者Beck抑郁量表第2版(MD=-8.400,95%CI:-10.890--5.920;P=0.000)、康奈尔精神抑郁量表(MD=-8.240,95%CI:-11.180--5.290;P=0.000)以及简明心境量表(MD=-24.210,95%CI:-30.740--17.680;P=0.000)评分改善程度均优于对照组;POMS量表6项分量表评分中拉莫三嗪组患者紧张-焦虑(MD=-3.360,95%CI:-4.620--2.100;P=0.000)、抑郁-沮丧(MD=-5.490,95%CI:-7.420--3.560;P=0.000)、愤怒-敌意(MD=-3.870,95%CI:-5.510--2.230;P=0.000)、疲乏-迟钝(MD=-4.480,95%CI:-5.630--3.320;P=0.000)、迷惑-混乱(MD=-2.720,95%CI:-3.730--1.720;P=0.000)评分均低于对照组,而精力-活力评分高于对照组(MD=3.970,95%CI:2.870-5.070;P=0.000)。结论拉莫三嗪添加治疗癫合并抑郁障碍疗效良好,主要不良反应为皮疹、中枢神经系统兴奋等。 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Triazines; Epilepsy; Depression; Meta-analysis CAO Juan, LI Dai, GAO Shan-shan, SONG Yi-jun( 1Department of Neurology, 2Department of Geriatrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China) Objective patients with epilepsy and comorbid depressive symptoms.MethodsRelevant clinical trials weresearched via Pub Med, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL), China NationalKnowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and Wanfang Data from January 1998 to June 2014 using the followingretrieval words: lamotrigine, epilepsy and depressive both in Chinese and English. The Cochrane Handbookfor Systematic Reviews of Interventions(Version 5.0.2) was used to evaluate the quality of randomizedcontrolled trials(RCTs). Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of included articles andabstracted the data. Meta-analysis was conducted using Rev Man 5.1.1 software.ResultsAccording to theinclusion criteria, 3 prospective clinical trials with a total of 668 patients were finally selected. The Meta-ana |
ISSN: | 1672-6731 |
DOI: | 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2016.01.005 |