Links Between the Intuitive Sense of Number and Formal Mathematics Ability
Humans share with other animals a system for thinking about numbers in an imprecise and intuitive way. The approximate number system (ANS) that underlies this thinking is present throughout the lifespan, is entirely nonverbal, and supports basic numerical computations like comparing, adding, and sub...
Saved in:
Published in | Child development perspectives Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 74 - 79 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.06.2013
Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Humans share with other animals a system for thinking about numbers in an imprecise and intuitive way. The approximate number system (ANS) that underlies this thinking is present throughout the lifespan, is entirely nonverbal, and supports basic numerical computations like comparing, adding, and subtracting quantities. Humans, unlike other animals, also have a system for representing exact numbers. This linguistically mediated system is slowly mastered over the course of many years and provides the basis for most of our formal mathematical thought. A growing body of evidence suggests that the nonverbal ANS and the culturally invented system of exact numbers are fundamentally linked. In this article, we review evidence for this relation, describing how group and individual differences in the ANS correlate with and even predict formal math ability. In this way, we illustrate how a system of ancient core knowledge may serve as a foundation for more complex mathematical thought. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:CDEP12019 NIH - No. R01 HD057258 ark:/67375/WNG-JBB0S96D-B istex:4BF30E2BE8B0F413E8751802FCDC4DEF7C246571 Lisa Feigenson, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University; Melissa E. Libertus, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University; Justin Halberda, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University. The authors gratefully acknowledge support from NIH Grant R01 HD057258. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1750-8592 1750-8606 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cdep.12019 |