Intragastric balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial
Background/objectives: This trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Orbera Intragastric Balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention. Subjects/methods: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial, 255 adults with a body mass index of 30–40 kg m − 2 were treated and outc...
Saved in:
Published in | International Journal of Obesity Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 427 - 433 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.03.2017
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background/objectives:
This trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Orbera Intragastric Balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention.
Subjects/methods:
In this multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial, 255 adults with a body mass index of 30–40 kg m
−
2
were treated and outcomes were assessed up to 12 months. Participants were randomized to endoscopic placement of an intragastric balloon plus lifestyle or lifestyle intervention alone. Balloons were removed at 6 months and lifestyle intervention continued for both groups through 12 months. At 9 months, coprimary end points were two measures of weight loss.
Results:
At 6 months, weight loss was −3.3% of total body weight (−3.2 kg) in the lifestyle arm vs −10.2% (−9.9 kg) in the balloon plus lifestyle arm (
P
<0.001); at 9 months (3 months postballoon removal), weight loss was −3.4% (−3.2 kg) vs −9.1% (−8.8 kg,
P
⩽0.001); and at 12 months, −3.1% (−2.9 kg) vs −7.6% (−7.4 kg,
P
⩽0.001). For the primary end points, at 9 months, mean percent loss of weight in excess of ideal body weight (s.d.) at 9 months was 26.5% (20.7) (
P
=0.32) and 9.7% (15.1) in the balloon and control groups, respectively. Also, 45.6% (36.7, 54.8) of the subjects randomized to the balloon achieved at least 15% loss of weight in excess of ideal body weight greater than the control group (
P
<0.001). The majority of balloon subjects experienced adverse events; 86.9% nausea, 75.6% vomiting, 57.5% abdominal pain and 18.8% had their device removed before 6 months because of an adverse event or subject request. Five subjects (3.1%) in the balloon group had a gastric abnormality at the time of device removal, and no ulcers were found.
Conclusions and relevance:
Intragastric balloon achieved greater short-term weight loss at 3 and 6 months postballoon removal than lifestyle intervention alone. Adverse gastrointestinal events were common. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0307-0565 1476-5497 1476-5497 |
DOI: | 10.1038/ijo.2016.229 |