Untangling the effects of multiple exposures with a common reference group in an epidemiologic study: A practical revisit

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 12; p. e0295915
• Main Authors: Fontaine, Robert E, He, Yulei, Zhu, Bao-Ping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 15.12.2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Contingency; Data analysis; Epidemiologic methods; Epidemiologic Studies; Epidemiologists; Epidemiology; Evaluation; Exposure; Generalized linear models; Multivariable control; Regression analysis; Regression models; Research Design; Statistical analysis; Variables; United States
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295915

When assessing multiple exposures in epidemiologic studies, epidemiologists often use multivariable regression models with main effects only to control for confounding. This method can mask the true effects of individual exposures, potentially leading to wrong conclusions. We revisited a simple, practical, and often overlooked approach to untangle effects of the exposures of interest, in which the combinations of all levels of the exposures of interest are recoded into a single, multicategory variable. One category, usually the absence of all exposures of interest, is selected as the common reference group (CRG). All other categories representing individual and joint exposures are then compared to the CRG using indicator variables in a regression model or in a 2×2 contingency table analysis. Using real data examples, we showed that using the CRG analysis results in estimates of individual and joint effects that are mutually comparable and free of each other's confounding effects, yielding a clear, accurate, intuitive, and simple summarization of epidemiologic study findings involving multiple exposures of interest.