Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases

Brain stimulation, a therapy increasingly used for neurological and psychiatric disease, traditionally is divided into invasive approaches, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), and noninvasive approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation. The relationship between these approaches is unknow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 111; no. 41; p. 14650
Main Authors Fox, Michael D., Buckner, Randy L., Liu, Hesheng, Chakravarty, M. Mallar, Lozano, Andres M., Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 14.10.2014
National Acad Sciences
SeriesPNAS Plus
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Brain stimulation, a therapy increasingly used for neurological and psychiatric disease, traditionally is divided into invasive approaches, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), and noninvasive approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation. The relationship between these approaches is unknown, therapeutic mechanisms remain unclear, and the ideal stimulation site for a given technique is often ambiguous, limiting optimization of the stimulation and its application in further disorders. In this article, we identify diseases treated with both types of stimulation, list the stimulation sites thought to be most effective in each disease, and test the hypothesis that these sites are different nodes within the same brain network as defined by resting-state functional-connectivity MRI. Sites where DBS was effective were functionally connected to sites where noninvasive brain stimulation was effective across diseases including depression, Parkinson's disease, obsessive-compulsive disorder, essential tremor, addiction, pain, minimally conscious states, and Alzheimer's disease. A lack of functional connectivity identified sites where stimulation was ineffective, and the sign of the correlation related to whether excitatory or inhibitory noninvasive stimulation was found clinically effective. These results suggest that resting-state functional connectivity may be useful for translating therapy between stimulation modalities, optimizing treatment, and identifying new stimulation targets. More broadly, this work supports a network perspective toward understanding and treating neuropsychiatric disease, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeted brain network modulation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: M.D.F. and A.P.-L. designed research; M.D.F. performed research; M.D.F., R.L.B., H.L., and M.M.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.D.F. and H.L. analyzed data; and M.D.F., R.L.B., M.M.C., A.M.L., and A.P.-L. wrote the paper.
Edited by Michael S. Gazzaniga, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, and approved August 28, 2014 (received for review March 17, 2014)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1405003111