Review of current status of refractive lens exchange and role of dysfunctional lens index as its new indication

Advances in phacodynamics and intraocular lenses (IOLs) has given second life to clear lens extraction (CLE) or refractive lens exchange (RLE) in recent years for the treatment of patients with high degrees of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism who are unsuitable for laser surgery. Furthermore, pres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndian journal of ophthalmology Vol. 68; no. 12; pp. 2797 - 2803
Main Authors Kaweri, Luci, Wavikar, Chandrashekhar, James, Edwin, Pandit, Payal, Bhuta, Namrata
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01.12.2020
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Advances in phacodynamics and intraocular lenses (IOLs) has given second life to clear lens extraction (CLE) or refractive lens exchange (RLE) in recent years for the treatment of patients with high degrees of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism who are unsuitable for laser surgery. Furthermore, presbyopia treatment with RLE supplemented with multifocal or accommodating IOLs gives the dual benefit of correcting refractive errors with eliminating the need for cataract surgery. RLE should be consistent and effective for a good refractive outcome along with safety during the surgical procedure and in the postoperative period. Therefore, proper patient selection and accurate preoperative protocols for IOL power calculations and selection are important along with an appropriate choice of surgical procedure. Dysfunctional lens index is a new objective tool that helps surgeon to aid in diagnosing, counseling, and educating patients with dysfunctional clear lens. In this article, we give a brief overview about the application of RLE for individuals with presbyopia and refractive errors like myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism who are not suitable for laser correction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0301-4738
1998-3689
DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2259_20