Metacommunity and phylogenetic structure determine wildlife and zoonotic infectious disease patterns in time and space

The potential for disease transmission at the interface of wildlife, domestic animals and humans has become a major concern for public health and conservation biology. Research in this subject is commonly conducted at local scales while the regional context is neglected. We argue that prevalence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcology and evolution Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 865 - 873
Main Authors Suzán, Gerardo, García‐Peña, Gabriel E., Castro‐Arellano, Ivan, Rico, Oscar, Rubio, André V., Tolsá, María J., Roche, Benjamin, Hosseini, Parviez R., Rizzoli, Annapaola, Murray, Kris A., Zambrana‐Torrelio, Carlos, Vittecoq, Marion, Bailly, Xavier, Aguirre, A. Alonso, Daszak, Peter, Prieur‐Richard, Anne‐Helene, Mills, James N., Guégan, Jean‐Francois
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2015
Wiley Open Access
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The potential for disease transmission at the interface of wildlife, domestic animals and humans has become a major concern for public health and conservation biology. Research in this subject is commonly conducted at local scales while the regional context is neglected. We argue that prevalence of infection at local and regional levels is influenced by three mechanisms occurring at the landscape level in a metacommunity context. First, (1) dispersal, colonization, and extinction of pathogens, reservoir or vector hosts, and nonreservoir hosts, may be due to stochastic and niche‐based processes, thus determining distribution of all species, and then their potential interactions, across local communities (metacommunity structure). Second, (2) anthropogenic processes may drive environmental filtering of hosts, nonhosts, and pathogens. Finally, (3) phylogenetic diversity relative to reservoir or vector host(s), within and between local communities may facilitate pathogen persistence and circulation. Using a metacommunity approach, public heath scientists may better evaluate the factors that predispose certain times and places for the origin and emergence of infectious diseases. The multidisciplinary approach we describe fits within a comprehensive One Health and Ecohealth framework addressing zoonotic infectious disease outbreaks and their relationship to their hosts, other animals, humans, and the environment. A metacommunity framework can help explain the occurrence patterns of diseases by linking the spatial, ecological, and evolutionary relationships between pathogens, hosts (including vectors), and non‐host species.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Funding Information This work is supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité through its Centre de Synthèse et d’Analyse sur la Biodiversité (CESAB) and its funded working group program “Disentangling the linkages between biodiversity and emerging infectious diseases” (BIODIS), and with additional support from the international research program DIVERSITAS. GEGP received a postdoctoral fellowship from FRB/CESAB. BR and J-FG are also funded by the Laboratoire d’Excellence Centre d’Etude de la Biodiversité Amazonienne (grant ANR-10-LABX-25-01). GS acknowledges the support provided by DGAPA-UNAM and CONACyT (Mexico). We thank Vanessa O. Ezenwa for comments and suggestions to this manuscript. AAA acknowledges the support provided by The Macroecology of Infectious Disease Research Coordination Network (funded by NSF DEB 131223).
ISSN:2045-7758
2045-7758
DOI:10.1002/ece3.1404