Quantification of minimal residual disease levels by flow cytometry at time of transplant predicts outcome after myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in ALL
The potential impact on patient outcome of different Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels at time of transplant in patients with lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) remains uncertain. In this study, we quantified MRD levels at time of transplant using multiparamete...
Saved in:
Published in | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 396 - 402 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.03.2013
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The potential impact on patient outcome of different Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels at time of transplant in patients with lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) remains uncertain. In this study, we quantified MRD levels at time of transplant using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC). Mononuclear cells from marrow aspirates were obtained from 102 adult and child patients before their conditioning regimen. Quantification of MRD levels was carried out by detecting patient-specific leukemia-associated immunophenotypes using four-color MFC. Thirty patients exhibited measurable levels of MRD at the time of transplant, with low levels (0.01 to ⩽0.1%) in 12 cases, intermediate levels (>0.1 to ⩽1%) in 8 cases and high levels (>1%) in 10 cases. The leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 65.9±7.0%, 42.9±15.7% and 0% for negative, low levels ⩽0.1% and intermediate-high levels >0.1%, respectively (
P
<0.001, log-rank test). Overall survival (OS) was 52.3±7.6%, 28.6±13.8% and 0% for MRD-negative, low levels ⩽0.1% and intermediate-high levels >0.1%, respectively (
P
<0.001, log-rank test). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that detection of leukemia cells by flow cytometry at transplant was the most significantly adverse factor for OS, LFS and EFS after transplant. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0268-3369 1476-5365 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bmt.2012.147 |