Shared space, separate processes: Neural activation patterns for auditory description and visual object naming in healthy adults

ABSTRACT Historically, both clinicians and cognitive scientists have used visual object naming measures to study naming, and lesion‐type studies have implicated the left posterior, temporo‐parietal region as a critical component of naming circuitry. However, recent results from behavioral and cortic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. 2507 - 2520
Main Authors Hamberger, Marla J., Habeck, Christian G., Pantazatos, Spiro P., Williams, Alicia C., Hirsch, Joy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2014
Wiley-Liss
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Historically, both clinicians and cognitive scientists have used visual object naming measures to study naming, and lesion‐type studies have implicated the left posterior, temporo‐parietal region as a critical component of naming circuitry. However, recent results from behavioral and cortical stimulation studies using auditory description naming as well as visual object naming in left temporal lobe epilepsy patients suggest that discrete sites in anterior temporal cortex are critical for description naming, whereas posterior temporal regions mediate both visual object naming and description naming. To determine whether this task specificity reflects normal cerebral organization and processing, 13 healthy adults performed description naming and visual naming during functional neuroimaging. In addition to standard univariate analysis, multivariate, ordinal trend analysis examined the network character of the regions involved in task‐specific naming. Univariate analysis indicated posterior temporal activation for both visual naming and description naming, whereas multivariate analysis revealed broader networks for both tasks, with both overlapping and task‐specific regions, as well as task‐related differences in the way the tasks utilized common regions. Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed unique, task‐specific, regionally covarying activation patterns that were strikingly consistent in all 13 subjects for visual naming and 12/13 subjects for description naming. Results suggest a common neural substrate, yet differentiable neural processes underlying visual naming and description naming in neurologically intact individuals. These findings support the use of both types of tasks for clinical assessment and may have application in the treatment of neurologically based naming deficits. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2507–2520, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:U.S. Army - No. RDECOM-TARDEC W56H2V-04-P-L (JH)
National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke - No. R01 NS35140
NRSA - No. F31MH088104-01A1
ArticleID:HBM22345
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering - No. NIBIB 5R01EB006204-03
istex:3E631F629E779A0EEE629E41EA4B127AF1E56229
ark:/67375/WNG-Z3MS8GJB-4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.22345