A comparative collision-based analysis of human gait

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 280; no. 1771; p. 20131779
• Main Authors: Lee, David V., Comanescu, Tudor N., Butcher, Michael T., Bertram, John E. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 22.11.2013
• Subjects: Adult; Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology; Biomechanics; Bipedal; Body Size; Female; Gait - physiology; Humans; Linear Models; Locomotion; Male; Mammal; Mechanical Cost; Models, Biological; Running - physiology; Species Specificity; Walking - physiology; bipedal; biomechanics; mammal; locomotion; mechanical cost
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 1471-2945; 1471-2954
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1779

This study compares human walking and running, and places them within the context of other mammalian gaits. We use a collision-based approach to analyse the fundamental dynamics of the centre of mass (CoM) according to three angles derived from the instantaneous force and velocity vectors. These dimensionless angles permit comparisons across gait, species and size. The collision angle Φ, which is equivalent to the dimensionless mechanical cost of transport CoTmech, is found to be three times greater during running than walking of humans. This threefold difference is consistent with previous studies of walking versus trotting of quadrupeds, albeit tends to be greater in the gaits of humans and hopping bipeds than in quadrupeds. Plotting the collision angle Φ together with the angles of the CoM force vector Θ and velocity vector Λ results in the functional grouping of bipedal and quadrupedal gaits according to their CoM dynamics—walking, galloping and ambling are distinguished as separate gaits that employ collision reduction, whereas trotting, running and hopping employ little collision reduction and represent more of a continuum that is influenced by dimensionless speed. Comparable with quadrupedal mammals, collision fraction (the ratio of actual to potential collision) is 0.51 during walking and 0.89 during running, indicating substantial collision reduction during walking, but not running, of humans.