Broadening the Berlin definition of ARDS to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen: an observational study in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19

Background High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is increasingly used in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It is uncertain whether a broadened Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which ARDS can be diagnosed in patients who are not receiving ventilation, resul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of intensive care Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 64
Main Authors van der Ven, Fleur-Stefanie L. I. M., Valk, Christel M. A., Blok, Siebe, Brouwer, Michelle G., Go, Dai Ming, Lokhorst, Amanda, Swart, Pien, van Meenen, David M. P., Paulus, Frederique, Schultz, Marcus J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 14.07.2023
Springer Nature B.V
SpringerOpen
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is increasingly used in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It is uncertain whether a broadened Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which ARDS can be diagnosed in patients who are not receiving ventilation, results in similar groups of patients receiving HFNO as in patients receiving ventilation. Methods We applied a broadened definition of ARDS in a multicenter, observational study in adult critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), wherein the requirement for a minimal level of 5 cm H 2 O PEEP with ventilation is replaced by a minimal level of airflow rate with HFNO, and compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients receiving HFNO and patients receiving ventilation. The primary endpoint was ICU mortality. We also compared outcomes in risk for death groups using the PaO 2 /FiO 2 cutoffs as used successfully in the original definition of ARDS. Secondary endpoints were hospital mortality; mortality on days 28 and 90; need for ventilation within 7 days in patients that started with HFNO; the number of days free from HFNO or ventilation; and ICU and hospital length of stay. Results Of 728 included patients, 229 patients started with HFNO and 499 patients with ventilation. All patients fulfilled the broadened Berlin definition of ARDS. Patients receiving HFNO had lower disease severity scores and lower PaO 2 /FiO 2 than patients receiving ventilation. ICU mortality was lower in receiving HFNO (22.7 vs 35.6%; p  = 0.001). Using PaO 2 /FiO 2 cutoffs for mild, moderate and severe arterial hypoxemia created groups with an ICU mortality of 16.7%, 22.0%, and 23.5% ( p  = 0.906) versus 19.1%, 37.9% and 41.4% ( p  = 0.002), in patients receiving HFNO versus patients receiving ventilation, respectively. Conclusions Using a broadened definition of ARDS may facilitate an earlier diagnosis of ARDS in patients receiving HFNO; however, ARDS patients receiving HFNO and ARDS patients receiving ventilation have distinct baseline characteristics and mortality rates. Trial registration : The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04719182).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2110-5820
2110-5820
DOI:10.1186/s13613-023-01161-6