Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC ophthalmology Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 172 - 18
Main Authors Li, Jinyu, Sun, Bin, Zhang, Yuexin, Hao, Yansong, Wang, Ze, Liu, Chengjiang, Jiang, Shanhao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 16.04.2024
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Acuity
Binocular vision
Cataract
Cataract Extraction - methods
Cataracts
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
Eye surgery
Humans
Intelligence
Intervention
Intraocular lenses
Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods
Lenses, Intraocular
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Ophthalmology
Presbyopia
Presbyopia - physiopathology
Presbyopia - surgery
Prosthesis Design
Rankings
Refraction, Ocular - physiology
Safety
Surgery
Vision, Binocular - physiology
Visual acuity
Visual Acuity - physiology
Visual impairment
Visual quality
Presbyopia
Cataract
Visual quality
Intraocular lenses
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2415
1471-2415
DOI10.1186/s12886-024-03446-1

Cover

Abstract Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Results Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). Conclusions For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
AbstractList Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Results Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). Conclusions For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs. Keywords: Presbyopia, Cataract, Intraocular lenses, Visual quality
To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis.PURPOSETo assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis.A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software.METHODSA systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software.Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near).RESULTSTwenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near).For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.CONCLUSIONSFor cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
Abstract Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Results Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). Conclusions For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Results Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). Conclusions For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
PurposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software.ResultsTwenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near).ConclusionsFor cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
ArticleNumber 172
Audience Academic
Author Zhang, Yuexin
Liu, Chengjiang
Hao, Yansong
Wang, Ze
Li, Jinyu
Sun, Bin
Jiang, Shanhao
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jinyu
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Jinyu
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou Medical University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Bin
  surname: Sun
  fullname: Sun, Bin
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou Medical University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yuexin
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Yuexin
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou Medical University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yansong
  surname: Hao
  fullname: Hao, Yansong
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou Medical University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ze
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Ze
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Chengjiang
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Chengjiang
  organization: Department of General Medicine, Affiliated Anqing First People’s Hospital of Anhui Medical University
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Shanhao
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Shanhao
  email: 17865556075@163.com
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou Medical University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38627651$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTZsUnxL4rBB1YhLpUpsYG2dOMeDhyQe7GSqPAcvjNNpaadCVaQkPvn_7-TY_2l2NPgBs-w1o-eMqfJ9ZFypMqdc5lRIWebsWXbCZMVyLllx9OD9ODuNcUMpp1KoF9mxUCWvyoKdZH9Wvt9CgNHtkKC1zoCZCQwtiWBxnIm3BLqO_HJDG5eFG8YA3kwdBNLhEDGmEtkGjM3stw5y40NAM7phTQyMCW1GEqewxjB_IEDiHEfsUz9DAu4cXt8063GEHAbo5ujiy-y5hS7iq9vnWfbj86fvq6_51bcvl6uLq9yUVI25onVJOWtLUytacASjoG4rwxsrjFKM0qppirLhtsK0Tvei5qahRhTGCKDiLLvcc1sPG70Nrocwaw9O3xR8WGsI6Uc71IJZZDXWtpJSKuRKFI3lwEzTgBSVTayPe9Z2anpsDS7b1B1AD78M7qde-51mLJ1KyepEeHdLCP73hHHUvYsGuw4G9FPUgkoqOKW1TNK3j6QbP4W0e4uqkKyWlBX3qjWkCdxgfWpsFqi-qOqUBCb5wjr_jypdLfbOpMBZl-oHhjcPJ_034l2mkkDtBSb4GANabdyYDtwvg7tOM6qX-Op9fHWKr76Jr16s_JH1jv6kSexNMYmHlLP73XjC9RdsqwOH
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_18008_1816_5095_2024_4_674_680
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13237404
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2025_1533161
crossref_primary_10_4103_IJO_IJO_1643_24
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13144133
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_024_01085_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clae_2024_102253
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S500386
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6
10.2147/OPTH.S253250
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000399
10.1007/s00417-022-05700-y
10.3928/1081597X-20210802-02
10.1007/s10792-020-01584-1
10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.013
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000743
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000971
10.1097/ICU.0000000000000547
10.1080/08164622.2021.1896337
10.1136/bmj.n160
10.1097/APO.0000000000000253
10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3
10.1007/s00417-021-05245-6
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026
10.2147/OPTH.S273641
10.1038/s41433-018-0068-5
10.1186/s12886-023-02844-1
10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.014
10.3928/1081597X-20160803-02
10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01839-6
10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.025
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000012
10.1111/ceo.13084
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001123
10.3928/1081597X-20190530-01
10.3928/1081597X-20180214-01
10.2147/OPTH.S295503
10.5935/0004-2749.20210029
10.1038/s41433-021-01600-3
10.1007/164_2016_90
10.1097/ICU.0000000000000956
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000978
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.015
10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.02.012
10.3390/jcm11144150
10.1097/APO.0000000000000296
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000212
10.4103/ijo.IJO_2921_21
10.1177/11206721221125004
10.1177/1120672120926870
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000747
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.025
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000118
10.3390/jcm10153268
10.5301/ejo.5000994
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000061
10.1186/s12886-019-1204-0
10.1097/ICU.0000000000000340
10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00212-6
10.1016/j.ajo.2023.01.024
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000274
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000777
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000712
10.3928/1081597X-20190708-02
10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.048
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000210
10.4103/tjo.tjo_19_17
10.17116/oftalma202213805130
10.4103/tjo.tjo_136_18
10.1016/j.pop.2015.05.012
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001142
10.1111/ceo.13310
10.3928/1081597X-20180125-01
10.3928/1081597X-20211109-02
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3667
10.1007/s10792-020-01579-y
10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5
10.1038/s41433-020-0806-3
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000988
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2024
2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2024
– notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12886-024-03446-1
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Proquest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic


MEDLINE
Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 5
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2415
EndPage 18
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_31fe19e9f74448e2835bf2a1cbba437f
PMC11020619
A790431424
38627651
10_1186_s12886_024_03446_1
Genre Comparative Study
Network Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7TK
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8096021d6c98052eac8a9d7c2bf3c881007bb56b2f7ec88f7e592cb0c35cc3a03
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2415
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:45 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:34:10 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 05:42:02 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 08:37:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:17:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:08:21 EDT 2025
Wed Jul 30 01:47:43 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:30 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:28:15 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:22:25 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Presbyopia
Cataract
Visual quality
Intraocular lenses
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c608t-8096021d6c98052eac8a9d7c2bf3c881007bb56b2f7ec88f7e592cb0c35cc3a03
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12886-024-03446-1
PMID 38627651
PQID 3054194015
PQPubID 44797
PageCount 18
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_31fe19e9f74448e2835bf2a1cbba437f
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11020619
proquest_miscellaneous_3040320094
proquest_journals_3054194015
gale_infotracmisc_A790431424
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A790431424
pubmed_primary_38627651
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12886_024_03446_1
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_024_03446_1
springer_journals_10_1186_s12886_024_03446_1
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-04-16
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-04-16
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-04-16
  day: 16
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC ophthalmology
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Ophthalmol
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References LC Salerno (3446_CR8) 2017; 7
F Poyales (3446_CR30) 2019; 45
EM Law (3446_CR32) 2020; 46
J Thompson (3446_CR2) 2015; 42
R Bilbao-Calabuig (3446_CR74) 2016; 32
J Xu (3446_CR76) 2019; 35
TB Ferreira (3446_CR71) 2022; 48
P Karuppiah (3446_CR70) 2022; 70
SC Schallhorn (3446_CR63) 2019; 35
A Arrigo (3446_CR60) 2021; 259
M Karam (3446_CR73) 2023; 251
R Rampat (3446_CR61) 2021; 128
U Unsal (3446_CR22) 2021; 41
M Gil (3446_CR69) 2022; 11
MJ Page (3446_CR26) 2021; 372
G Cardona (3446_CR28) 2018; 28
Y Guo (3446_CR68) 2021; 2021
FJ Ribeiro (3446_CR35) 2020; 46
X Liu (3446_CR15) 2018; 34
K Cao (3446_CR11) 2019; 64
J Fernández (3446_CR9) 2023; 23
JY Cho (3446_CR25) 2022; 140
S Li (3446_CR55) 2019; 30
G Savini (3446_CR20) 2018; 34
R Sieburth (3446_CR66) 2019; 9
D Zamora-de La Cruz (3446_CR10) 2023; 1
W He (3446_CR75) 2018; 32
CD Hall (3446_CR19) 2022; 105
JM Schallhorn (3446_CR12) 2021; 128
CM Lee (3446_CR1) 2017; 28
JW Kim (3446_CR17) 2021; 37
R Mencucci (3446_CR23) 2020; 46
H Hashemi (3446_CR3) 2020; 34
HB Dick (3446_CR58) 2022; 48
R Mencucci (3446_CR65) 2018; 256
JL Alió (3446_CR27) 2018; 46
J Crispim (3446_CR5) 2017; 242
MV Cicinelli (3446_CR6) 2023; 401
3446_CR51
3446_CR50
D Gatinel (3446_CR16) 2013; 39
3446_CR54
S Keel (3446_CR4) 2021; 9
3446_CR53
3446_CR52
HB Dick (3446_CR62) 2021; 128
M Böhm (3446_CR64) 2019; 45
LF Ong (3446_CR7) 2023; 34
D Zamora-de La Cruz (3446_CR59) 2020; 6
KB Pershin (3446_CR72) 2022; 138
P Kanclerz (3446_CR21) 2020; 9
T Reinhard (3446_CR40) 2021; 259
DT Hogarty (3446_CR29) 2018; 46
S Modi (3446_CR13) 2021; 128
N Mamalis (3446_CR18) 2021; 47
3446_CR44
F Poyales (3446_CR33) 2020; 14
GU Auffarth (3446_CR37) 2021; 47
3446_CR43
3446_CR42
H Sabur (3446_CR24) 2023; 33
3446_CR48
3446_CR47
RR Sudhir (3446_CR57) 2019; 8
A Messias (3446_CR38) 2021; 84
3446_CR46
J Liu (3446_CR14) 2019; 19
3446_CR45
R Lapid-Gortzak (3446_CR31) 2020; 46
LV Nováček (3446_CR39) 2021; 10
3446_CR49
VSC Webers (3446_CR36) 2020; 46
DB Tran (3446_CR41) 2021; 15
KG Gundersen (3446_CR67) 2020; 14
F Ribeiro (3446_CR34) 2020; 46
SS Khandelwal (3446_CR56) 2019; 257
References_xml – volume: 257
  start-page: 863
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR56
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1071
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR67
  publication-title: Clin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S253250
– volume: 47
  start-page: 184
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR37
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000399
– volume: 2021
  start-page: 1115076
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR68
  publication-title: J Ophthalmol
– ident: 3446_CR47
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05700-y
– volume: 37
  start-page: 746
  issue: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR17
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210802-02
– ident: 3446_CR42
  doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01584-1
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1469
  issue: 10
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR12
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.013
– ident: 3446_CR46
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000743
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1270
  issue: 11
  year: 2022
  ident: 3446_CR58
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000971
– volume: 30
  start-page: 39
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR55
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000547
– volume: 105
  start-page: 70
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 3446_CR19
  publication-title: Clin Exp Optom
  doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1896337
– volume: 372
  start-page: n160
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR26
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160
– volume: 8
  start-page: 335
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR57
  publication-title: Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)
  doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000253
– volume: 256
  start-page: 1913
  issue: 10
  year: 2018
  ident: 3446_CR65
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3
– volume: 259
  start-page: 2717
  issue: 9
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR60
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05245-6
– volume: 128
  start-page: e164
  issue: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR61
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026
– volume: 14
  start-page: 3237
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR33
  publication-title: Clin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S273641
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1237
  issue: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 3446_CR75
  publication-title: Eye (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0068-5
– volume: 23
  start-page: 101
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 3446_CR9
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02844-1
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1625
  issue: 11
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR64
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.014
– volume: 32
  start-page: 748
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: 3446_CR74
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160803-02
– volume: 401
  start-page: 377
  issue: 10374
  year: 2023
  ident: 3446_CR6
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01839-6
– volume: 1
  start-page: Cd012648
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 3446_CR10
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 45
  start-page: 135
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR30
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.025
– volume: 46
  start-page: 193
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR36
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000012
– volume: 46
  start-page: 380
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 3446_CR27
  publication-title: Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/ceo.13084
– ident: 3446_CR52
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001123
– volume: 35
  start-page: 426
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR63
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190530-01
– volume: 34
  start-page: 273
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 3446_CR15
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-01
– volume: 15
  start-page: 403
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR41
  publication-title: Clin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S295503
– volume: 84
  start-page: 214
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR38
  publication-title: Arq Bras Oftalmol
  doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20210029
– ident: 3446_CR53
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01600-3
– volume: 242
  start-page: 163
  year: 2017
  ident: 3446_CR5
  publication-title: Handb Exp Pharmacol
  doi: 10.1007/164_2016_90
– volume: 34
  start-page: 280
  issue: 4
  year: 2023
  ident: 3446_CR7
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000956
– ident: 3446_CR50
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000978
– volume: 128
  start-page: 197
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR13
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.015
– volume: 64
  start-page: 647
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR11
  publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.02.012
– ident: 3446_CR48
  doi: 10.3390/jcm11144150
– volume: 9
  start-page: 194
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR21
  publication-title: Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)
  doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000296
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1247
  issue: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR34
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000212
– volume: 70
  start-page: 2867
  issue: 8
  year: 2022
  ident: 3446_CR70
  publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2921_21
– volume: 33
  start-page: 262
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 3446_CR24
  publication-title: Eur J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1177/11206721221125004
– ident: 3446_CR43
  doi: 10.1177/1120672120926870
– ident: 3446_CR45
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000747
– volume: 128
  start-page: e206
  issue: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR62
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.025
– volume: 46
  start-page: 694
  issue: 5
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR35
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000118
– volume: 6
  start-page: Cd012648
  issue: 6
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR59
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 10
  start-page: 3268
  issue: 15
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR39
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/jcm10153268
– volume: 28
  start-page: 36
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 3446_CR28
  publication-title: Eur J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000994
– volume: 46
  start-page: 378
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR23
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000061
– volume: 11
  start-page: 4150
  issue: 14
  year: 2022
  ident: 3446_CR69
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/jcm11144150
– volume: 19
  start-page: 198
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR14
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1204-0
– volume: 28
  start-page: 98
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 3446_CR1
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000340
– volume: 9
  start-page: e1460
  issue: 10
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR4
  publication-title: Lancet Glob Health
  doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00212-6
– volume: 251
  start-page: 52
  year: 2023
  ident: 3446_CR73
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.01.024
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1534
  issue: 11
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR31
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000274
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1256
  issue: 10
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR18
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000777
– ident: 3446_CR44
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000712
– volume: 35
  start-page: 484
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR76
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190708-02
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1093
  issue: 7
  year: 2013
  ident: 3446_CR16
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.048
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1020
  issue: 7
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR32
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000210
– volume: 7
  start-page: 179
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 3446_CR8
  publication-title: Taiwan J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_19_17
– volume: 138
  start-page: 30
  issue: 5
  year: 2022
  ident: 3446_CR72
  publication-title: Vestn Oftalmol
  doi: 10.17116/oftalma202213805130
– volume: 9
  start-page: 4
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 3446_CR66
  publication-title: Taiwan J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_136_18
– volume: 42
  start-page: 409
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 3446_CR2
  publication-title: Prim Care
  doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2015.05.012
– ident: 3446_CR54
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001142
– volume: 46
  start-page: 854
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 3446_CR29
  publication-title: Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/ceo.13310
– volume: 48
  start-page: 280
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  ident: 3446_CR71
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000743
– volume: 34
  start-page: 228
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 3446_CR20
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180125-01
– ident: 3446_CR51
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20211109-02
– volume: 140
  start-page: 1045
  issue: 11
  year: 2022
  ident: 3446_CR25
  publication-title: JAMA Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3667
– volume: 41
  start-page: 273
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR22
  publication-title: Int Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01579-y
– volume: 259
  start-page: 431
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  ident: 3446_CR40
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1357
  issue: 8
  year: 2020
  ident: 3446_CR3
  publication-title: Eye (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0806-3
– ident: 3446_CR49
  doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000988
SSID ssj0020438
Score 2.4163415
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus...
To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and...
Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus...
PurposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF),...
Abstract Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 172
SubjectTerms Acuity
Binocular vision
Cataract
Cataract Extraction - methods
Cataracts
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
Eye surgery
Humans
Intelligence
Intervention
Intraocular lenses
Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods
Lenses, Intraocular
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Ophthalmology
Presbyopia
Presbyopia - physiopathology
Presbyopia - surgery
Prosthesis Design
Rankings
Refraction, Ocular - physiology
Safety
Surgery
Vision, Binocular - physiology
Visual acuity
Visual Acuity - physiology
Visual impairment
Visual quality
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Pb9UwDI_QDogL4j-FgYKExAGiNU2aJtzGxDQhjROTdouSNBVPPNqJdof3OfaFZ6fte-sQcOFSKU2iJrFjx439MyFvZeODcaVjmlc1k7GIzOdOMSVk4CIaV6X0badf1cmZ_HJent9I9YU-YSM88LhwB4I3kZtomkqCJRERHsw3hePBeydF1aD0zU0-G1OTqYX3W3OIjFYHPUhhjc62kiHEnWJ8oYYSWv_vMvmGUrrtMHnr1jQpo-MH5P50iqSH4-gfkjuxfUTunk735I_J1dEO1JtGRIlwYUNdW9PeNXHY0K6hbr2mP8Ai77Gwwi92ySeVgh7qYw-vKDrJ-k13sXIsYBaPgD7SFP_4YGwV7ceQ6o_U0R0gNB2DYdLHfsbBMTfBnjwhZ8efvx2dsCn9Agsq1wPoLrBuCl6rYDDvAUho7UxdhcI3ImiN7hXel8oXTRWhDM_SFMHnQZQhCJeLp2Sv7dr4nFBXuFB6oGGopTROG2903cgqiFp7E11G-EwNGyZsckyRsbbJRtHKjhS0QEGbKGh5Rt5v-1yMyBx_bf0Jibxtiaja6QXwmp14zf6L1zLyDlnE4t6H4QHpxhAGmCSiaNnDyiBWkSxkRvYXLWHPhmX1zGR2khm9BckruQF7t8zIm2019kQ_uDZ2l9hGYsZ7sMkz8mzkye2UBBinlSphqnrBrYs5L2va1feEKA5nwAIOdiYjH2bG3o3rz4v64n8s6ktyr0gbUzKu9sne8OsyvoKD3uBfpz19DfyQUTg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NbtQwELagSIgL4p9AQUZC4gBWN7Hj2FxQqagqpHKi0t4s23FgxZIsTXrY5-gLd8ZJNqSIXiIldhRPZjzjsWe-IeStqJzXNrdMpUXJRMgCcwsrmeTCpzxoW8Tybaff5MmZ-LrMl8OGWzuEVY46MSrqsvG4R34AcinA4Qbr9Wnzh2HVKDxdHUpo3CZ3InQZyHOxnBwuPOUaE2WUPGhBFysMuRUMge4kS2fGKGL2_6uZ_zJN18Mmr52dRpN0_IDcH9aS9LBn_kNyK9SPyN3T4bT8Mbk8mqC9aUCsCOu31NYlbW0Vui1tKmrXa_oL_PIWb1b4xSZGplKwRm1o4RHFUFm3bTYryzzW8vAYKU1x3wczrGjbJ1Z_pJZOsNC0T4mJH_sdOsvsAH7yhJwdf_l-dMKGIgzMy4XqwIKBj5OlpfQaqx-AnlZWl4XPXMW9Uhhk4VwuXVYVAe7hmuvMu4XnuffcLvhTslc3dXhOqM2sz52uCl8Koa3STquyEoXnpXI62ISkIzeMHxDKsVDG2kRPRUnTc9AAB03koEkT8n73zqbH57ix92dk8q4nYmvHB835DzNMVcPTKqQ6wDgF-K4BAelcldnUO2cFL6qEvEMRMagBYHjAuj6RAYhELC1zWGhELBKZSMj-rCfMXD9vHoXMDJqjNZOcJ-TNrhnfxGi4OjQX2Edg3XvwzBPyrJfJHUkcXNRC5kCqmknrjOZ5S736GXHFYSWYwfJOJ-TDKNjTuP7_U1_cTMZLci-LU06wVO6Tve78IryChVznXsfZegXcpUgi
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9QwEA9ygvgifls9JYLggwY3TZomvp2LxyGcTx7cW0jSBBfX9rC9h_07_IedSbu71_MDfCm0mdCkM5NkOjO_IeSVTD4YVzmmed0wGcvI_MIppoQMXETj6ly-7fSzOjmTn86r8wkmB3NhrvrvuVbvelg_NYbJSobgdIqBpXOz4kJlx6xa7owr9Ghtk2L-2G-28WR8_t9X4Svb0PUQyWt-0rz9HN8ld6ZzIz0aGX2P3IjtfXLrdPKMPyA_l3sYbxoRF8KFDXVtQ3uX4rChXaJuvabfwAbv8WaFb-xyFCqFnaePPTyiGBbrN93FyrGAdTsCRkVT_MeD2VS0H5Oo31NH9xDQdEx_yS_7HgfH3AR08pCcHX_8sjxhU8EFFtRCD7BbgT1T8kYFg5UOYE3WzjR1KH0SQWsMqPC-Ur5MdYR7uFamDH4RRBWCcAvxiBy0XRufEOpKFypvUh0aKY3TxhvdJFkH0WhvoisI33LDhgmNHItirG22SrSyIwctcNBmDlpekDe7PhcjFsc_qT8gk3eUiKOdH4B42UktreApchNhnBLs1Ijgcz6VjgfvnRR1KshrFBGL2g7DA9aNSQswScTNske1QXQiWcqCHM4oQUvDvHkrZHZaJXoLa63kBizcqiAvd83YEyPf2thdIo3EGvdghRfk8SiTuykJMEdrVcFU9UxaZ3Oet7SrrxlDHE59JRzlTEHebgV7P66_f9Sn_0f-jNwuswpKxtUhORh-XMbncIgb_Iusvb8AJEJBGA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-024-03446-1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38627651
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3054194015
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3040320094
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11020619
https://doaj.org/article/31fe19e9f74448e2835bf2a1cbba437f
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fi9QwEA_nHYgvh_-tnksEwQetbts0TQSR2-WOQ9hDDhcWX0KSprq4157bPXA_h1_YmbTdtefpgy-FNGmTdGYymWbmN4Q8Z4WxUqc6FFGWh8zFLjRDzUOeMBslTurMp2-bnPKTKfswS2c7pEt31H7A-lrTDvNJTZeL1z--r9-DwL_zAi_4mxrWWIGutCxEADsegjW0B5qJozE2YZtTBQwDFV3gzLXP9ZSTx_D_c6X-TVVddaO8cpbqVdTxbbLf7i3pYcMMd8iOK--Sm5P29Pwe-TneQn1Th9gR2q6pLnNa68Kt1rQqqF4s6Dew02sszLHHynuqUtBOtavhFkXXWbOuLuY6tJjbw6LnNMX_QBhxResm0Pot1XQLE02bEBnf2blb6VC3YCj3yfT46NP4JGyTMoSWD8UKNBrYPHGUcysxGwKs20LLPLOxKRIrBDpdGJNyExeZgzJcUxlbM7RJam2ih8kDsltWpXtEqI61TY0sMpszJrWQRoq8YJlNcmGk0wGJOmoo2yKWY-KMhfKWi-CqoaACCipPQRUF5OXmmYsGr-OfrUdI5E1LxNr2N6rlF9WKrkqiwkXSwTgZ2LIOAepMEevIGqNZkhUBeYEsopBHYXhAuiawASaJ2FrqMJOIYMRiFpCDXkuQZNuv7phMdYKgYD1mkQQrOA3Is001PonecaWrLrENGyZ4zAWveNjw5GZKCZisGU9hqqLHrb0592vK-VePMw47wxi2ezIgrzrG3o7r7x_18f_39ITcir04sjDiB2R3tbx0T2HTtzIDciObZQOyNzo6_XgGpTEfD_wPlIGXcbiejT7_AtL0XJE
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELdGJwEviG8CA4wE4gGsNY6T2EgIbWNTx9YKoU3am7EdBypKUpZOqH8H_wd_I3f5aOkQe9tLpMROYufO9xHf_Y6Q5yK3TpnYMBmmGROee2b7JmFJJFwYeWXSunzbcJQMjsWHk_hkjfzucmEwrLKTibWgzkqH_8g3gS8FONygvd5NfzCsGoW7q10JjYYtDvz8J7hs1dv990DfF5zv7R7tDFhbVYC5pC9nIJLBaOdhljiFcP4geKRRWeq4zSMnJUYNWBsnlueph3M4xoo723dR7Fxk-hE89wpZF5jR2iPr27ujj58WLh7uq3WpOTLZrED6SwzyFQyh9RIWrqi_ukrAv7rgL2V4PlDz3G5trQT3bpIbrfVKtxp2u0XWfHGbXB22-_N3yK-dJZg49YhOYdycmiKjlcn9bE7LnJrJhH4bF1mFJ2N8Y1nHwlLQf5Wv4BLF4Fw7L6djwxxWD3EYm03xTxPmdNGqSeV-Qw1dAlHTJgmnftl3PzPMtHArd8nxpRDoHukVZeEfEGq4cbFVeeoyIZSRyiqZ5SJ1USat8iYgYUcN7VpMdCzNMdG1byQT3VBQAwV1TUEdBuTV4p5pgwhyYe9tJPKiJ6J51xfK0y-6FQ46CnMfKg_jFOAte4TAszk3obPWiCjNA_ISWUSjzIHhAema1AmYJKJ36a1UIUaS4CIgGys9QVa41eaOyXQrqyq9XFkBebZoxjsx_q7w5Rn2Ef0IN9LgEfcbnlxMKQKnOE1imKpc4daVOa-2FOOvNZI52J4cDEoVkNcdYy_H9f-P-vDiaTwl1wZHw0N9uD86eESu83r5CRYmG6Q3Oz3zj8GMnNkn7dql5PNli4s_zSiGmQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELZQkSouiDeBAkZC4gBRN7Hj2NzKwqo8WnGgUm-W7dhlxZKsmvSwv4M_zIyT3W3KQ-ISKfE4sXfsGc_OzDeEvODBOmUKk8qsrFLuc5_aiRGpYNxlzCtTxvJtR8fi8IR_PC1OL2Xxx2j3tUuyz2lAlKa6219Wod_iUuy3IFUlBs_yFCHrRAr2z3WOqg_dtWK6MbnQz7VOlfljv5E6iqj9v8vmS8rpauDkFe9pVEqzW-TmcJqkBz37b5Nrvr5Ddo8Gf_ld8nO6BfemHtEijFtRU1e0NcF3K9oEahYL-h0s8xZv5vjFJsamUtBHrW_hEcVgWbtqlnOTOqzm4TBWmuI_P5hjRds-tfoNNXQLDE37pJj4sR--M6kZ4E_ukZPZ-6_Tw3Qow5A6MZEd6DCwcvKsEk5h_QOQ1NKoqnS5DcxJiWEW1hbC5qH0cA_XQuXOThwrnGNmwu6Tnbqp_UNCTW5cYVUoXcW5MlJZJavAS8cqaZU3CcnW3NBuwCjHUhkLHW0VKXTPQQ0c1JGDOkvIq02fZY_Q8U_qt8jkDSWia8cHzfmZHjarZlnwmfIwTg7Wq0dIOhtykzlrDWdlSMhLXCIaZQAMD1jXpzLAJBFNSx-UCjGLeM4TsjeihL3rxs3rRaYH2dFqkMA8U2D3Fgl5vmnGnhgPV_vmAmn4hKFjC17xoF-TmykxMFJLUcBU5Wi1juY8bqnn3yKyOJwFczjgqYS8Xi_s7bj-_qM--j_yZ2T3y7uZ_vzh-NNjciOPu5GnmdgjO935hX8Cp7zOPo0b-RcmFkxM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+efficacy+and+safety+of+all+kinds+of+intraocular+lenses+in+presbyopia-correcting+cataract+surgery%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMC+ophthalmology&rft.au=Li%2C+Jinyu&rft.au=Sun%2C+Bin&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yuexin&rft.au=Hao%2C+Yansong&rft.date=2024-04-16&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2415&rft.volume=24&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12886-024-03446-1&rft.externalDocID=PMC11020619
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon