Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: BMC ophthalmology Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 172 - 18
• Main Authors: Li, Jinyu, Sun, Bin, Zhang, Yuexin, Hao, Yansong, Wang, Ze, Liu, Chengjiang, Jiang, Shanhao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 16.04.2024; BioMed Central Ltd; BMC
• Subjects: Acuity; Binocular vision; Cataract; Cataract Extraction - methods; Cataracts; Clinical trials; Comparative analysis; Contrast Sensitivity - physiology; Eye surgery; Humans; Intelligence; Intervention; Intraocular lenses; Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods; Lenses, Intraocular; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Ophthalmology; Presbyopia; Presbyopia - physiopathology; Presbyopia - surgery; Prosthesis Design; Rankings; Refraction, Ocular - physiology; Safety; Surgery; Vision, Binocular - physiology; Visual acuity; Visual Acuity - physiology; Visual impairment; Visual quality; Presbyopia; Cataract; Visual quality; Intraocular lenses
• ISSN: 1471-2415; 1471-2415
• DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03446-1

Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Results Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). Conclusions For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.