Comparison of Subjective Facial Emotion Recognition and “Facial Emotion Recognition Based on Multi-Task Cascaded Convolutional Network Face Detection” between Patients with Schizophrenia and Healthy Participants

• Published in: Healthcare (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 12; p. 2363
• Main Authors: Akiyama, Toshiya, Matsumoto, Kazuyuki, Osaka, Kyoko, Tanioka, Ryuichi, Betriana, Feni, Zhao, Yueren, Kai, Yoshihiro, Miyagawa, Misao, Yasuhara, Yuko, Ito, Hirokazu, Soriano, Gil, Tanioka, Tetsuya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 24.11.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Analysis; Camcorders; Care and treatment; Data collection; Diagnosis; Digital video; Emotions; Hallucinations; Neural networks; Patients; Research design; Robots; Schizophrenia; Verbal communication; Japan; patients with schizophrenia; multi-task cascaded convolutional networks; facial emotion recognition; healthy participants; human–robot interaction; reliability
• ISSN: 2227-9032; 2227-9032
• DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122363

Patients with schizophrenia may exhibit a flat affect and poor facial expressions. This study aimed to compare subjective facial emotion recognition (FER) and FER based on multi-task cascaded convolutional network (MTCNN) face detection in 31 patients with schizophrenia (patient group) and 40 healthy participants (healthy participant group). A Pepper Robot was used to converse with the 71 aforementioned participants; these conversations were recorded on video. Subjective FER (assigned by medical experts based on video recordings) and FER based on MTCNN face detection was used to understand facial expressions during conversations. This study confirmed the discriminant accuracy of the FER based on MTCNN face detection. The analysis of the smiles of healthy participants revealed that the kappa coefficients of subjective FER (by six examiners) and FER based on MTCNN face detection concurred (κ = 0.63). The perfect agreement rate between the subjective FER (by three medical experts) and FER based on MTCNN face detection in the patient, and healthy participant groups were analyzed using Fisher’s exact probability test where no significant difference was observed (p = 0.72). The validity and reliability were assessed by comparing the subjective FER and FER based on MTCNN face detection. The reliability coefficient of FER based on MTCNN face detection was low for both the patient and healthy participant groups.