Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk

• Published in: Behavior research methods Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 2022 - 2038
• Main Authors: Chandler, Jesse, Rosenzweig, Cheskie, Moss, Aaron J., Robinson, Jonathan, Litman, Leib
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.10.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Attention; Behavioral Research - methods; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Cognitive Psychology; Crowdsourcing; Data Accuracy; Humans; Internet; Mass Screening; Psychology; Religiosity; Reproducibility of Results; Social Sciences; Students; Data collection; Prime panels; Mechanical Turk; Online experimentation
• ISSN: 1554-3528; 1554-351X; 1554-3528
• DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7

Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) is widely used by behavioral scientists to recruit research participants. MTurk offers advantages over traditional student subject pools, but it also has important limitations. In particular, the MTurk population is small and potentially overused, and some groups of interest to behavioral scientists are underrepresented and difficult to recruit. Here we examined whether online research panels can avoid these limitations. Specifically, we compared sample composition, data quality (measured by effect sizes, internal reliability, and attention checks), and the non-naivete of participants recruited from MTurk and Prime Panels—an aggregate of online research panels. Prime Panels participants were more diverse in age, family composition, religiosity, education, and political attitudes. Prime Panels participants also reported less exposure to classic protocols and produced larger effect sizes, but only after screening out several participants who failed a screening task. We conclude that online research panels offer a unique opportunity for research, yet one with some important trade-offs.