Electricity-market price and nuclear power plant shutdown: Evidence from California
Japan׳s Fukushima nuclear disaster, triggered by the March 11, 2011 earthquake, has led to calls for shutting down existing nuclear plants. To maintain resource adequacy for a grid׳s reliable operation, one option is to expand conventional generation, whose marginal unit is typically fueled by natur...
Saved in:
Published in | Energy policy Vol. 73; no. C; pp. 234 - 244 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01.10.2014
Elsevier Elsevier Science Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Japan׳s Fukushima nuclear disaster, triggered by the March 11, 2011 earthquake, has led to calls for shutting down existing nuclear plants. To maintain resource adequacy for a grid׳s reliable operation, one option is to expand conventional generation, whose marginal unit is typically fueled by natural-gas. Two timely and relevant questions thus arise for a deregulated wholesale electricity market: (1) what is the likely price increase due to a nuclear plant shutdown? and (2) what can be done to mitigate the price increase? To answer these questions, we perform a regression analysis of a large sample of hourly real-time electricity-market price data from the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) for the 33-month sample period of April 2010–December 2012. Our analysis indicates that the 2013 shutdown of the state׳s San Onofre plant raised the CAISO real-time hourly market prices by $6/MWH to $9/MWH, and that the price increases could have been offset by a combination of demand reduction, increasing solar generation, and increasing wind generation.
•Japan׳s disaster led to calls for shutting down existing nuclear plants.•We perform a regression analysis of California׳s real-time electricity-market prices.•We estimate that the San Onofre plant shutdown has raised the market prices by $6/MWH to $9/MWH.•The price increases could be offset by demand reduction and renewable generation increase. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 AC02-06CH11357 USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) |
ISSN: | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.027 |