A mobile approach-avoidance task

Approach and avoidance tendencies have helped explain phenomena as diverse as addiction (Mogg, Field, & Bradley, 2005 ), phobia (Rinck & Becker, 2007 ), and intergroup discrimination (Bianchi, Carnaghi, & Shamloo, 2018 ; Degner, Essien, & Reichardt, 2016 ). When the original approach...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavior research methods Vol. 52; no. 5; pp. 2085 - 2097
Main Authors Zech, Hilmar G., Rotteveel, Mark, van Dijk, Wilco W., van Dillen, Lotte F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.10.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Approach and avoidance tendencies have helped explain phenomena as diverse as addiction (Mogg, Field, & Bradley, 2005 ), phobia (Rinck & Becker, 2007 ), and intergroup discrimination (Bianchi, Carnaghi, & Shamloo, 2018 ; Degner, Essien, & Reichardt, 2016 ). When the original approach-avoidance task (AAT; Solarz, 1960 ) that measures these tendencies was redesigned to run on regular desktop computers, it made the task much more flexible but also sacrificed some important behavioral properties of the original task—most notably its reliance on physical distance change (Chen & Bargh, 1999 ). Here, we present a new, mobile version of the AAT that runs entirely on smartphones and combines the flexibility of modern tasks with the behavioral properties of the original AAT. In addition, it can easily be deployed in the field and, next to traditional reaction time measurements, includes the novel measurement of response force. In two studies, we demonstrate that the mobile AAT can reliably measure known approach-avoidance tendencies toward happy and angry faces both in the laboratory and in the field.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1554-3528
1554-351X
1554-3528
DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01379-3