Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

• Published in: Lung Vol. 194; no. 3; pp. 447 - 458
• Main Authors: Lu, Peng, Chen, Xiu, Zhu, Li-mei, Yang, Hai-tao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.06.2016; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Area Under Curve; Bioassays; Complications and side effects; Diagnosis; Humans; Influence; Interferon; Interferon-gamma Release Tests; Medical diagnosis; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Pneumology/Respiratory System; ROC Curve; Tuberculin Test; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis; Interferon-gamma release assays; Specificity; Tuberculosis; Diagnosis; Tuberculin skin test
• ISSN: 0341-2040; 1432-1750
• DOI: 10.1007/s00408-016-9872-5

Background and Objective We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the accuracy of the interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases for relevant published studies in recent decades and calculated pooled estimated sensitivities, specificities, DOR, and SROC curve of the QFT-IT, T-SPOT and TST. Random-effects models were used to assess estimates from studies with significant heterogeneity. Moreover, area under the curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of the tests. Results Overall, 9 studies for QFT-IT, 12 studies for T-SPOT, and 16 studies for TST involving 3586 participants were included in this analysis. We found that sensitivities of the QFT-IT, T-SPOT, and TST were respectively 0.842 (95 % CI 0.811–0.870), 0.840 (95 % CI 0.814–0.864), and 0.665 (CI 0.635–0.693); specificities were respectively 0.745 (95 % CI 0.715–0.775), 0.658 (95 % CI 0.621–0.693), and 0.633 (CI 0.605–0.661); positive likelihood ratios were respectively 3.652 (95 % CI 2.180–6.117), 2.196 (95 % CI 1.727–2.794), and 1.825 (95 % CI 1.351–2.464); negative likelihood ratios were respectively 0.212 (95 % CI 0.109–0.414), 0.246 (95 % CI 0.161–0.377), and 0.556 (95 % CI 0.385–0.804); the SROC curves were 19.205, 10.397, and 3.810. Conclusions The two IGRAs showed better performance than TST for the diagnosis of the tuberculosis. However, neither of them showed stability in the diagnosis of TB.