Inter-rectus distance in postpartum women can be reduced by isometric contraction of the abdominal muscles: a preliminary case–control study

• Published in: Physiotherapy Vol. 100; no. 4; pp. 344 - 348
• Main Authors: Pascoal, A.G., Dionisio, S., Cordeiro, F., Mota, P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2014
• Subjects: Abdominal strength exercises; Case-Control Studies; Diastasis abdominis; Exercise Therapy - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Inter-rectus distance; Isometric Contraction - physiology; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Muscle Strength - physiology; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Post partum; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Rectus Abdominis - anatomy & histology; Rectus Abdominis - diagnostic imaging; Reference Values; Risk Assessment; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound scanning; Young Adult; Post partum; Abdominal strength exercises; Inter-rectus distance; Ultrasound scanning; Diastasis abdominis
• ISSN: 0031-9406; 1873-1465; 1873-1465
• DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.11.006

To determine the effect of isometric contraction of the abdominal muscles on inter-rectus distance in postpartum women. Preliminary case–control study. Research laboratory. Ten postpartum women {mean age 30 [standard deviation (SD) 4] years; mean weight 58 (SD 7) kg; mean height 159 (SD 4) cm} and 10 nulliparous (control) women [mean age 28 (SD 2) years; mean weight 56 (SD 6) kg; mean height 160 (SD 6) cm]. Ultrasound images from the anterior abdominal wall were recorded at rest (supine position) and during an abdominal isometric contraction, with the subject actively performing an abdominal crunch (crook lying position). Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the inter-rectus distance between groups (postpartum vs control) and between levels of abdominal muscle activation (rest vs isometric contraction). Inter-rectus distance 2cm above the level of the umbilicus. The inter-rectus distance was significantly greater in the postpartum group compared with the control group [14.7 (SD 3.1) mm vs 9.6 (SD 2.8) mm; mean difference 5.1mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4 to 6.8]. The inter-rectus distance was significantly lower during isometric contraction compared with rest [10.7 (SD 3.1) mm vs 13.4 (SD 3.1) mm; mean difference 2.8mm; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.5]. No interaction was found between group and muscle contraction. The inter-rectus distance was significantly higher in postpartum women compared with controls, and significantly lower during isometric contraction of the abdominal muscles (abdominal crunch) compared with rest.