Impulsive Errors on a Go-NoGo Reaction Time Task: Disinhibitory Traits in Relation to a Family History of Alcoholism

Background:  Behavioral undercontrol may contribute to risk for alcoholism in vulnerable persons. We predicted that healthy young adults with a family history of alcoholism (FH+) who also displayed externalizing behavior characteristics (low scores on the California Psychological Inventory Sociabili...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 888 - 894
Main Authors Saunders, Buddy, Farag, Noha, Vincent, Andrea S., Collins Jr, Frank L., Sorocco, Kristen H., Lovallo, William R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2008
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:  Behavioral undercontrol may contribute to risk for alcoholism in vulnerable persons. We predicted that healthy young adults with a family history of alcoholism (FH+) who also displayed externalizing behavior characteristics (low scores on the California Psychological Inventory Sociability Scale; CPI‐So) would exhibit more impulsive responding (false alarms) on a Go‐NoGo reaction time task. Methods:  Subjects were 230 healthy volunteers, 18 to 30 years of age with no history of alcohol or drug dependence. The task included 100 trials: 60 of “Go,” calling for a button press, and 40 of “NoGo,” or “XX,” calling for inhibiting a response. Data analysis involved a signal detection analysis of performance with subsequent group comparisons for rates of impulsive responding indicated by False Alarms (responses to NoGo signals). Results:  CPI‐So scores were lower in FH+ than in FH– (p < .000001) indicating a greater clustering of disinhibitory tendencies in these persons. FH, CPI‐So scores, and Gender together predicted false alarm rates, accounting for 4.9% of the variance, F = 3.89, p = 0.009. False alarms were associated with low CPI‐So scores, F = 5.15, p = 0.024, and being male, F = 6.27, p = 0.013, but not with FH once these variables were accounted for. Conclusions:  A disinhibited temperament may underlie a behavioral impulsivity that contributes to elevated risk for future alcoholism, especially among FH+ males.
Bibliography:istex:2AC6FB09A9BB5A889B49E12B7A27F13C9BD65398
ArticleID:ACER648
ark:/67375/WNG-0CH9XHW2-0
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0145-6008
1530-0277
1530-0277
DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00648.x