胸腺肽α1对乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者淋巴细胞亚群的影响

目的观察乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者应用胸腺肽α1后外周血淋巴细胞亚群的变化,分析胸腺肽α1对患者免疫功能的影响。方法选取2015年10月-2016年12月郑州大学第一附属医院收治的乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者106例,随机分为对照组和治疗组各53例,另选同期20例体检者作为健康组。对照组给予内科综合治疗,治疗组在综合治疗的基础上加用胸腺肽α1,分别于治疗前、治疗12周后使用流式细胞仪器检测患者外周血CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+细胞数、CD4^+/CD8^+比值、CD19百分比、NK细胞百分比。观察临床症状和并发症,以及不良反应发生情况。计量资料多组间比较采用方差分析,进一步两两比较采用LS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in临床肝胆病杂志 Vol. 33; no. 11; pp. 2132 - 2135
Main Author 仝静;孙长宇;杨黎冰;梁亚林;康艳楠
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 郑州大学第一附属医院感染科,郑州,450052 2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:目的观察乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者应用胸腺肽α1后外周血淋巴细胞亚群的变化,分析胸腺肽α1对患者免疫功能的影响。方法选取2015年10月-2016年12月郑州大学第一附属医院收治的乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期患者106例,随机分为对照组和治疗组各53例,另选同期20例体检者作为健康组。对照组给予内科综合治疗,治疗组在综合治疗的基础上加用胸腺肽α1,分别于治疗前、治疗12周后使用流式细胞仪器检测患者外周血CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+细胞数、CD4^+/CD8^+比值、CD19百分比、NK细胞百分比。观察临床症状和并发症,以及不良反应发生情况。计量资料多组间比较采用方差分析,进一步两两比较采用LSD-t检验;两组间比较采用成组t检验或配对t检验。计数资料的组间比较采用χ-2检验。结果治疗前,与健康组相比,治疗组和对照组患者外周血CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+细胞数、CD4^+/CD8^+比值、CD19百分比、NK细胞百分比均明显降低(P值均〈0.05);治疗12周后,与对照组相比,治疗组CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+细胞数明显升高(t值分别为5.051、5.379、2.066,P值均〈0.05),CD4^+/CD8^+比值、CD19细胞百分比、NK细胞百分比有升高趋势(P值均〉0.05)。治疗组治疗12周与治疗前相比,CD3^+细胞数、CD4^+细胞数、CD4^+/CD8^+比值明显升高(t值分别为7.647、7.851、4.384,P值均〈0.001)。治疗过程中,出现的不良反应为头晕、头痛,对照组和治疗组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ^2=1.039,Ρ=0.308)。所有病例未发生严重不良反应。结论胸腺肽α1可明显改善乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿患者淋巴细胞亚群比例失衡问题,提高患者免疫功能。
Bibliography:liver cirrhosis ; hepatitis B ; lymphocyte subsets; thymosin
TONG Jing, SUN Changyu, YANG Libing, et al. (Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China)
Objective To investigate the change in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets after the application of thymosin α1 in patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis,as well as the effect of thymosin α1 on immune function.Methods A total of 106 patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled and randomly divided into control group and treatment group,with 53 patients in each group,and 20 healthy subjects who underwent physical examination were enrolled as healthy group.The patients in the control group were given comprehensive medical treatment,and those in the treatment group were given thymosin α1 in addition to the comprehensive medical treatment.Flow cytometry was use
ISSN:1001-5256
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.11.016