Evaluation of methods to extract and quantify lipids from Synechocystis PCC 6803

In order to use the photosynthetic cyanobacterium Synechocystis as a source of feedstock for carbon–neutral, nonpetroleum-based diesel fuel, we evaluated several solvents and solvent systems for their ability to extract lipid from wild-type Synechocystis PCC 6803. Chloroform + methanol-based Folch a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioresource technology Vol. 102; no. 2; pp. 1697 - 1703
Main Authors Sheng, Jie, Vannela, Raveender, Rittmann, Bruce E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 2011
[New York, NY]: Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In order to use the photosynthetic cyanobacterium Synechocystis as a source of feedstock for carbon–neutral, nonpetroleum-based diesel fuel, we evaluated several solvents and solvent systems for their ability to extract lipid from wild-type Synechocystis PCC 6803. Chloroform + methanol-based Folch and Bligh & Dyer methods had the highest lipid recoveries. Less toxic solvents, such as methanol and MTBE, or direct trans-esterification of biomass (without pre-extraction step) gave only slightly lower lipid-extraction yields. Ethanol, isopropanol, butanol, hexane, acetic ester, and their combinations were not effective for lipid extraction from Synechocystis (>20% loss), even though they are widely used for non-polar lipid extraction from other feedstock, including algae. We confirmed the success of chloroform + methanol-based extraction by their penetration of the cell membrane system, higher polarity, and stronger interaction with hydrogen bonds. The less-polar solvents not only had lower lipid yield, but also extracted more non-lipid compounds that require extra purification to remove. We also characterized the fatty-acid profile of Synechocystis PCC 6803: C16:0 (∼60%), C16:1 (∼9.5%), C18:0 (∼1.2%), C18:1 (∼2%), C18:2 (∼9.8%), and C18:3 (∼16.5%).
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.007
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.007