How low can you go? Use of low- and standard-dose liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of invasive fungal infections
Recommended doses of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) range from 3 to 6mg/kg/day, but 1mg/kg/day may be equally effective and a lower cost alternative for many indications. The objective of this analysis was to assess indications and clinical outcomes of patients who received low-dose (1mg/kg/day ro...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of infectious diseases Vol. 17; no. 8; pp. e615 - e620 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
Elsevier Ltd
01.08.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Recommended doses of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) range from 3 to 6mg/kg/day, but 1mg/kg/day may be equally effective and a lower cost alternative for many indications. The objective of this analysis was to assess indications and clinical outcomes of patients who received low-dose (1mg/kg/day rounded up in 50-mg increments) and standard-dose (≥2mg/kg/day) L-AMB.
This was a retrospective analysis of adult L-AMB recipients with suspected invasive fungal infections (IFI) at a single center from 2006 to 2011. The primary outcome was clinical response at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included survival and toxicity. Results were analyzed using Chi-square and descriptive statistics.
Of 89 adult L-AMB recipients included, 36 had proven or probable IFIs. Nineteen (53%) received low doses and 17 (47%) received standard doses. Median doses were 1.5 and 3.0mg/kg/day. Cryptococcus was the most common fungal pathogen in the low-dose group (37%), and Candida spp. in the standard-dose group (47%). Forty-seven percent of subjects in both groups improved clinically. Sixty-eight percent of low-dose recipients and 76% of standard-dose recipients survived to discharge. Rates of nephrotoxicity and hypokalemia were comparable.
Comparable rates of clinical improvement, survival to discharge, and toxicity were identified among low- and standard-dose L-AMB recipients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1201-9712 1878-3511 1878-3511 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.01.015 |