Oncologist approaches to communicating uncertain disease status in pediatric cancer: a qualitative study

• Published in: BMC cancer Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 1109
• Main Authors: Porter, Amy S, Woods, Cameka, Stall, Melanie, Velrajan, Srilakshmi, Baker, Justin N, Mack, Jennifer W, Kaye, Erica C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 31.10.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Cancer; Care and treatment; Children; Codes; Communication; Content analysis; Diagnosis; Disclosure; Diseases; Families & family life; Hospitals; Illnesses; Interviews; Medical prognosis; Oncology; Palliative care; Patients; Pediatrics; Prognosis; Qualitative research; Uncertainty; Verbal communication; United States
• ISSN: 1471-2407; 1471-2407
• DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10190-6

Background Most patients with cancer and their caregivers desire honest, clear prognostic communication, yet oncologists often disclose prognosis inconsistently. Prognostic communication becomes even more challenging when disease progression is unclear or equivocal. Presently, oncologist approaches for discussing uncertain disease findings are poorly understood. Methods In this prospective, longitudinal study, we audio-recorded serial disease reevaluation conversations between children with high-risk cancer, their families, and their primary oncologists over 24 months and conducted content analysis at recorded timepoints when oncologists categorized disease progression as equivocal. Results Of the 265 medical discussions recorded across the illness course for 33 patient-parent dyads, a total of 40 recorded discussions took place at equivocal timepoints, comprising > 500 min of medical dialogue. Prognosis talk encompassed < 3% of dialogue and was absent in nearly half of equivocal discussions (17/40, 42.5%). Curability statements were identified in only two conversations. Inductive content analysis of dialogue revealed four distinct patterns for communicating equivocal disease status: (1) up-front reassurance, (2) softening the message, (3) describing possible disease progression without interpretation, (4) expressing uncertainty without discussing the bigger picture. Conclusion Oncologists rarely discuss prognosis with children with high-risk cancer and their families at timepoints when disease progression is not definitive. Formal guidance is needed to better support oncologists in navigating uncertainty while sharing honest, person- and family-centered information about prognosis. Keywords: Pediatrics, Communication, Prognosis, Uncertainty