Quantitative measurement of IgG to SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens using monoclonal antibody‐based enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays

Objective Standardised quantitative analysis of the humoral immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens may be useful for estimating the extent and duration of immunity. The aim was to develop enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the quantification of human IgG antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical & translational immunology Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. e1369 - n/a
Main Authors Sander, Ingrid, Kespohl, Sabine, Zahradnik, Eva, Göcke, Philipp, Hosbach, Ingolf, Herrmann, Burkhard L, Brüning, Thomas, Raulf, Monika
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Standardised quantitative analysis of the humoral immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens may be useful for estimating the extent and duration of immunity. The aim was to develop enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the quantification of human IgG antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens. Methods Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays were developed based on monoclonal antibodies against human IgG and recombinant SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens (Spike‐S1 and Nucleocapsid). The WHO 67/086 immunoglobulin and WHO 20/136 SARS‐CoV‐2 references were used for standardisation. Sera of a study group of COVID‐19‐positive subjects (n = 144), pre‐pandemic controls (n = 135) and individuals vaccinated with BioNTech–Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine (n = 48) were analysed. The study group sera were also tested using EuroImmun SARS‐CoV‐2‐ELISAs and a quantitative S1‐specific fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) from Thermo Fisher. Results The ELISA results were repeatable and traceable to international units because of their parallelism to both WHO references. In the study group, median anti‐S1‐IgG concentrations were 102 BAU mL−1, compared to 100 and 1457 BAU mL−1 in the vaccination group after first and second vaccination, respectively. The ELISAs achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.965 (S1) and 0.955 (Nucleocapsid) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and a specificity of 1 (S1) and 0.963 (Nucleocapsid) and sensitivity of 0.903 (S1) and 0.833 (Nucleocapsid) at the maximum Youden index. In comparison, the commercial assays (S1‐FEIA, S1 and Nucleocapsid ELISA EuroImmun) achieved sensitivities of 0.764, 0.875 and 0.882 in the study group, respectively. Conclusions The quantitative ELISAs to measure IgG binding to SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens have good analytical and clinical performance characteristics and units traceable to international standards. We developed ELISAs to quantify IgG levels in response to SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens with good analytical and clinical performance that can be carried out using common laboratory equipment, provide results in units traceable to international standards (IU and BAU) and can be easily adapted to quantify IgG to SARS‐CoV‐2‐mutated proteins and other antigens.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2050-0068
2050-0068
DOI:10.1002/cti2.1369