Health‐related quality of life in long‐term prostate cancer survivors after nerve‐sparing and non‐nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy—Results from the multiregional PROCAS study

Background Nerve‐sparing (NS) surgery was developed to improve postoperative sexual and potentially urological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, it is largely unknown how NSRP affects health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) including urinary and sexual outcomes in prostate cancer (P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer medicine (Malden, MA) Vol. 9; no. 15; pp. 5416 - 5424
Main Authors Adam, Salome, Martin‐Diener, Eva, Camey, Bertrand, Egger Hayoz, Céline, Konzelmann, Isabelle, Mohsen Mousavi, Seyed, Herrmann, Christian, Rohrmann, Sabine, Wanner, Miriam, Staehelin, Katharina, Strebel, Räto T., Randazzo, Marco, John, Hubert, Schmid, Hans‐Peter, Arndt, Volker
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.08.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Nerve‐sparing (NS) surgery was developed to improve postoperative sexual and potentially urological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, it is largely unknown how NSRP affects health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) including urinary and sexual outcomes in prostate cancer (PC) survivors 5‐10 years after diagnosis in comparison with Non‐NSRP. Methods The study population included 382 stage pT2‐T3N0M0 PC survivors 5‐10 years post diagnosis, who were identified from the multiregional Prostate Cancer Survivorship in Switzerland (PROCAS) study. Briefly, in 2017/2018, PC survivors were identified via six population‐based cancer registries based in both German‐ and French‐speaking Switzerland. HRQoL and PC‐specific symptom burden was assessed using the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and EORTC QLQ‐PR25 questionnaires. Differences in HRQoL outcomes between survivors treated with NSRP (uni‐ & bilateral) and Non‐NSRP were analyzed with multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, years since diagnosis, cancer stage, comorbidities at diagnosis, and further therapies, if appropriate. Multiple imputation was performed to minimize the bias due to missing data. Results Five to ten years after diagnosis, PC survivors treated with NSRP and Non‐NSRP reported similar symptom burden and comparable HRQoL function scores. The only significant differences were reported for sexual activity, whereas PC survivors who underwent NSRP reported statistically significant (P = .031) higher sexual activity than those on Non‐NSRP. NSRP and Non‐NSRP reported similar scores for urinary symptoms and all other HRQoL outcomes. Conclusions Our results support nerve‐sparing techniques as an option to improve postoperative sexual, but not urinary outcomes after RP in long‐term PC survivors. Nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy and non‐nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy were generally associated with comparable long‐term health‐related quality of life outcomes, but nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy was linked with significantly higher sexual activity scores than non‐nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy. Our results support nerve‐sparing techniques as an option to improve postoperative sexual but not urinary outcomes after radical prostatectomy in long‐term prostate cancer survivors.
Bibliography:Funding information
The PROCAS study was financially supported by Swiss Bridge. Salome Adam was financially supported by the Béatrice Ederer‐Weber Foundation. These funding agencies had no further role in study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.3197