Functional and cognitive capacity differ in dystonic motor subtypes when compared to choreatic and hypokinetic‐rigid motor subtypes in Huntington's disease
Background Motor phenotypes in Huntington's disease vary manifold. Phenotype classification is essential to adapt treatment. The aim of this study was to classify a dystonic subtype closer. Methods A total of 7,512 manifest ENROLL‐HD participants were subdivided into mainly choreatic (N = 606),...
Saved in:
Published in | Brain and behavior Vol. 10; no. 8; pp. e01704 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.08.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2162-3279 2162-3279 |
DOI | 10.1002/brb3.1704 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Motor phenotypes in Huntington's disease vary manifold. Phenotype classification is essential to adapt treatment. The aim of this study was to classify a dystonic subtype closer.
Methods
A total of 7,512 manifest ENROLL‐HD participants were subdivided into mainly choreatic (N = 606), dystonic (N = 402), and hypokinetic‐rigid (N = 369) subjects. Cognitive (verbal fluency, symbol digit, stroop color, trail making, Mini‐Mental State Examination), functional (total functional capacity, Independence Scale), and psychiatric (problem behaviors assessment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) performance was evaluated at baseline visit.
Results
Symptoms onset for dystonic were similar to hypokinetic‐rigid, but earlier compared to choreatic subjects (p < .001). Cognition was better in both groups compared to hypokinetic rigid (all p < .001). Functionality differed between all groups (all p < .001). Differences remained (all p < .001) after controlling for CAP score, CAG, age, disease duration, and education.
Conclusions
Motor subtypes differ in functional and cognitive capacities but less in psychiatric. We identified better cognitive and functional capacities and similar onsets in predominant dystonic compared to hypokinetic‐rigid patients.
The research confirmed that motoric phenotypes are relevant for functional and cognitive capacities in HD. Onsets in dystonic patients are similar to hypokinetic‐rigids. Cognitive capacity is better in dystonic and choreatic than hypokinetic‐rigids patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/brb3.1704 The peer review history for this article is available at Jannis Achenbach and Sarah Maria von Hein did not receive any funding for the last 12 months. Dr. Saft reports personal fees/honoraria from Teva Pharma GmbH, as well as nonfinancial support and other support from ENROLL‐HD study (CHDI), PRIDE‐HD (TEVA), LEGATO (TEVA), and Amaryllis (Pfizer), ASO (IONIS Pharmaceuticals and Roche AG) for conduction of studies, and grants from Biogen all outside the submitted work and without relevance to the manuscript. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/brb3.1704 |
ISSN: | 2162-3279 2162-3279 |
DOI: | 10.1002/brb3.1704 |