Functional and cognitive capacity differ in dystonic motor subtypes when compared to choreatic and hypokinetic‐rigid motor subtypes in Huntington's disease

Background Motor phenotypes in Huntington's disease vary manifold. Phenotype classification is essential to adapt treatment. The aim of this study was to classify a dystonic subtype closer. Methods A total of 7,512 manifest ENROLL‐HD participants were subdivided into mainly choreatic (N = 606),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain and behavior Vol. 10; no. 8; pp. e01704 - n/a
Main Authors Achenbach, Jannis, Hein, Sarah Maria, Saft, Carsten
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.08.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2162-3279
2162-3279
DOI10.1002/brb3.1704

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Motor phenotypes in Huntington's disease vary manifold. Phenotype classification is essential to adapt treatment. The aim of this study was to classify a dystonic subtype closer. Methods A total of 7,512 manifest ENROLL‐HD participants were subdivided into mainly choreatic (N = 606), dystonic (N = 402), and hypokinetic‐rigid (N = 369) subjects. Cognitive (verbal fluency, symbol digit, stroop color, trail making, Mini‐Mental State Examination), functional (total functional capacity, Independence Scale), and psychiatric (problem behaviors assessment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) performance was evaluated at baseline visit. Results Symptoms onset for dystonic were similar to hypokinetic‐rigid, but earlier compared to choreatic subjects (p < .001). Cognition was better in both groups compared to hypokinetic rigid (all p < .001). Functionality differed between all groups (all p < .001). Differences remained (all p < .001) after controlling for CAP score, CAG, age, disease duration, and education. Conclusions Motor subtypes differ in functional and cognitive capacities but less in psychiatric. We identified better cognitive and functional capacities and similar onsets in predominant dystonic compared to hypokinetic‐rigid patients. The research confirmed that motoric phenotypes are relevant for functional and cognitive capacities in HD. Onsets in dystonic patients are similar to hypokinetic‐rigids. Cognitive capacity is better in dystonic and choreatic than hypokinetic‐rigids patients.
Bibliography:Funding information
https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/brb3.1704
The peer review history for this article is available at
Jannis Achenbach and Sarah Maria von Hein did not receive any funding for the last 12 months. Dr. Saft reports personal fees/honoraria from Teva Pharma GmbH, as well as nonfinancial support and other support from ENROLL‐HD study (CHDI), PRIDE‐HD (TEVA), LEGATO (TEVA), and Amaryllis (Pfizer), ASO (IONIS Pharmaceuticals and Roche AG) for conduction of studies, and grants from Biogen all outside the submitted work and without relevance to the manuscript.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/brb3.1704
ISSN:2162-3279
2162-3279
DOI:10.1002/brb3.1704