Differences in the Nonverbal Requests of Great Apes and Human Infants

This study investigated how great apes and human infants use imperative pointing to request objects. In a series of three experiments (infants, N = 44; apes, N = 12), subjects were given the opportunity to either point to a desired object from a distance or else to approach closer and request it pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChild development Vol. 85; no. 2; pp. 444 - 455
Main Authors van der Goot, Marloes H., Tomasello, Michael, Liszkowski, Ulf
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, MA Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2014
Wiley for the Society for Research in Child Development
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated how great apes and human infants use imperative pointing to request objects. In a series of three experiments (infants, N = 44; apes, N = 12), subjects were given the opportunity to either point to a desired object from a distance or else to approach closer and request it proximally. The apes always approached close to the object, signaling their request through instrumental actions. In contrast, the infants quite often stayed at a distance, directing the experimenters' attention to the desired object through index-finger pointing, even when the object was in the open and they could obtain it by themselves. Findings distinguish 12-month-olds' imperative pointing from ontogenetic and phylogenetic earlier forms of ritualized reaching.
Bibliography:ArticleID:CDEV12141
istex:9E2CF0734C7518558C37D5A3CA5CE6F528A91CAE
ark:/67375/WNG-1VNGQ5T5-G
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0009-3920
1467-8624
DOI:10.1111/cdev.12141