Differences in the Nonverbal Requests of Great Apes and Human Infants
This study investigated how great apes and human infants use imperative pointing to request objects. In a series of three experiments (infants, N = 44; apes, N = 12), subjects were given the opportunity to either point to a desired object from a distance or else to approach closer and request it pro...
Saved in:
Published in | Child development Vol. 85; no. 2; pp. 444 - 455 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, MA
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2014
Wiley for the Society for Research in Child Development Wiley-Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study investigated how great apes and human infants use imperative pointing to request objects. In a series of three experiments (infants, N = 44; apes, N = 12), subjects were given the opportunity to either point to a desired object from a distance or else to approach closer and request it proximally. The apes always approached close to the object, signaling their request through instrumental actions. In contrast, the infants quite often stayed at a distance, directing the experimenters' attention to the desired object through index-finger pointing, even when the object was in the open and they could obtain it by themselves. Findings distinguish 12-month-olds' imperative pointing from ontogenetic and phylogenetic earlier forms of ritualized reaching. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:CDEV12141 istex:9E2CF0734C7518558C37D5A3CA5CE6F528A91CAE ark:/67375/WNG-1VNGQ5T5-G ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0009-3920 1467-8624 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cdev.12141 |