Evaluation of Rapid Lateral-Flow Tests Directed against the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein Using Viral Suspensions Belonging to Different Lineages of SARS-CoV-2

Within the successive waves that occurred during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, recommendations arose to test symptomatic and contact subjects by using rapid antigen devices directed against the viral nucleocapsid protein with the aim to isolate contagious patients without delay. The objective of this stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inViruses Vol. 14; no. 12; p. 2628
Main Authors Pillet, Sylvie, Courtieux, Julien, Gonzalo, Sylvie, Bechri, Issam, Bourlet, Thomas, Valette, Martine, Bal, Antonin, Pozzetto, Bruno
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 25.11.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Within the successive waves that occurred during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, recommendations arose to test symptomatic and contact subjects by using rapid antigen devices directed against the viral nucleocapsid protein with the aim to isolate contagious patients without delay. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of four rapid lateral-flow tests (RLFT) that were commercially available on the French market in 2022 to recognize various strains of SARS-CoV-2. Series of five-fold dilutions of seven viral suspensions belonging to different lineages of SARS-CoV-2 (19A, 20A, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron) were used to evaluate the analytical sensitivity of four commercially available RLFTs (manufacturers: Abbott, AAZ, Becton-Dickinson and Biospeedia). Cell culture and quantitative RT-PCR were used as references. Excellent correlations were observed for each lineage strain between the viral titer obtained via cell culture and the number of RNA copies measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Although the four tests were able to recognize all the tested variants, significant differences in terms of sensitivity were observed between the four RLFTs. Despite the limitation represented by the small number of devices and clinical isolates that were tested, this study contributed by rapidly comparing the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RLFTs in the Omicron era.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1999-4915
1999-4915
DOI:10.3390/v14122628