Cumulative dietary risk characterisation of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid
A retrospective chronic cumulative risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticide residues, supported by an uncertainty analysis based on expert knowledge elicitation, was conducted for two effects on the thyroid, hypothyroidism and parafollicular cell (C‐cell) hypertrophy, hyperplasia and neoplas...
Saved in:
Published in | EFSA journal Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. e06088 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.04.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A retrospective chronic cumulative risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticide residues, supported by an uncertainty analysis based on expert knowledge elicitation, was conducted for two effects on the thyroid, hypothyroidism and parafollicular cell (C‐cell) hypertrophy, hyperplasia and neoplasia. The pesticides considered in this assessment were identified and characterised in the scientific report on the establishment of cumulative assessment groups of pesticides for their effects on the thyroid. Cumulative exposure assessments were conducted through probabilistic modelling by EFSA and the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) using two different software tools and reported separately. These exposure assessments used monitoring data collected by Member States under their official pesticide monitoring programmes in 2014, 2015 and 2016 and individual consumption data from 10 populations of consumers from different countries and different age groups. This report completes the characterisation of cumulative risk, taking account of the available data and the uncertainties involved. For each of the 10 populations, it is concluded with varying degrees of certainty that cumulative exposure to pesticides that have the chronic effects on the thyroid mentioned above does not exceed the threshold for regulatory consideration established by risk managers.
This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1836/full http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1835/full
This publication is linked to the following EFSA Journal articles: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6087/full |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This publication is linked to the following EFSA Journal articles http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1836/full http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6087/full http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1835/full This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Acknowledgements: EFSA wishes to thank the following for the support provided to this scientific output: Olavi Pelkonen, Joanna Tzoulaki and Anneli Widenfalk, and the other members of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues, for the scientific review and endorsement, respectively, of this scientific output; EFSA staff members Daniela Brocca and Paula Medina for the support provided to this scientific report. Approved: 20 March 2020 Requestor: EFSA This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1836/full http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1835/full Question number: EFSA‐Q‐2018‐00346 This publication is linked to the following EFSA Journal articles: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6087/full |
ISSN: | 1831-4732 1831-4732 |
DOI: | 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6088 |