The interdisciplinary decision problem: Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism in forestry

Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcology and society Vol. 23; no. 3; p. 40
Main Authors Persson, Johannes, Thorén, Henrik, Olsson, Lennart
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ottawa Resilience Alliance 01.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration, or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches, Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism, to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences involved can be expected.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1708-3087
1708-3087
DOI:10.5751/ES-10401-230340