Conducting Science in Disasters: Recommendations from the NIEHS Working Group for Special IRB Considerations in the Review of Disaster Related Research

• Published in: Environmental health perspectives Vol. 125; no. 9; pp. 094503 - 189005
• Main Authors: Packenham, Joan P., Rosselli, Richard T., Ramsey, Steve K., Taylor, Holly A., Fothergill, Alice, Slutsman, Julia, Miller, Aubrey
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 01.09.2017; Environmental Health Perspectives
• Subjects: At risk populations; Brief Communication; CFR; Community involvement; Consent; Councils; Disaster management; Disaster relief; Disaster studies; Disasters; Earthquakes; Emergencies; Emergency preparedness; Epidemics; Ethical standards; Ethics; Ethics Committees, Research; Evaluation; Forecasts and trends; Human subjects; Humans; Informed consent; Legal medicine; Medical research; Mental health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.); National security; Pandemics; Participation; Prospective Studies; Public Health; Public health administration; Researchers; Review boards; United States; Working groups; United States > US
• ISSN: 0091-6765; 1552-9924; 1552-9924
• DOI: 10.1289/EHP2378

Research involving human subjects after public health emergencies and disasters may pose ethical challenges. These challenges may include concerns about the vulnerability of prospective disaster research participants, increased research burden among disaster survivors approached by multiple research teams, and potentially reduced standards in the ethical review of research by institutional review boards (IRBs) due to the rush to enter the disaster field. The NIEHS Best Practices Working Group for Special IRB Considerations in the Review of Disaster Related Research was formed to identify and address ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the review of disaster research. The working group consists of a diverse collection of disaster research stakeholders across a broad spectrum of disciplines. The working group convened in July 2016 to identify recommendations that are instrumental in preparing IRBs to review protocols related to public health emergencies and disasters. The meeting included formative didactic presentations and facilitated breakout discussions using disaster-related case studies. Major thematic elements from these discussions were collected and documented into 15 working group recommendations, summarized in this article, that address topics such as IRB disaster preparedness activities, informed consent, vulnerable populations, confidentiality, participant burden, disaster research response integration and training, IRB roles/responsibilities, community engagement, and dissemination of disaster research results. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2378.