Comparative Safety of Antipsychotic Medications in Nursing Home Residents

Objectives To compare the risk of major medical events in nursing home residents newly initiated on conventional or atypical antipsychotic medications (APMs). Design Cohort study, using linked Medicaid, Medicare, Minimum Data Set, and Online Survey Certification and Reporting data. Propensity score‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 60; no. 3; pp. 420 - 429
Main Authors Huybrechts, Krista F., Schneeweiss, Sebastian, Gerhard, Tobias, Olfson, Mark, Avorn, Jerry, Levin, Raisa, Lucas, Judith A., Crystal, Stephen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2012
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives To compare the risk of major medical events in nursing home residents newly initiated on conventional or atypical antipsychotic medications (APMs). Design Cohort study, using linked Medicaid, Medicare, Minimum Data Set, and Online Survey Certification and Reporting data. Propensity score‐adjusted proportional hazards models were used to compare risks for medical events at a class and individual drug level. Setting Nursing homes in 45 U.S. states. Participants Eighty‐three thousand nine hundred fifty‐nine Medicaid‐eligible residents aged 65 and older who initiated APM treatment after nursing home admission in 2001 to 2005. Measurements Hospitalization for myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, serious bacterial infections, and hip fracture within 180 days of treatment initiation. Results Risks of bacterial infections (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–1.49) and possibly myocardial infarction (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.81–1.86) and hip fracture (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.95–1.76) were higher, and risks of cerebrovascular events (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.65–1.02) were lower in participants initiating conventional APMs than in those initiating atypical APMs. Little variation existed between individual atypical APMs, except for a somewhat lower risk of cerebrovascular events with olanzapine (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.81–1.02) and quetiapine (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79–1.02) and a lower risk of bacterial infections (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73–0.94) and possibly a higher risk of hip fracture (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.96–1.43) with quetiapine than with risperidone. Dose‐response relationships were observed for all events (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05–1.19 for high vs low dose for all events combined). Conclusion These associations underscore the importance of carefully selecting the specific APM and dose and monitoring their safety, especially in nursing home residents who have an array of medical illnesses and are undergoing complex medication regimens.
Bibliography:Table S1. Outcome definitions and their validity.
National Institute of Mental Health - No. R01-MH078708
ArticleID:JGS3853
istex:FC2BAA4E9A45FEFD0B0763CAA6E9662852E9EF63
ark:/67375/WNG-FZMMCMM3-D
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)/FDA - No. HS017918; No. HS016097
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03853.x