Characteristics and quality of rotation-specific resident learning goals: a prospective study

• Published in: Medical education online Vol. 25; no. 1; p. 1714198
• Main Authors: Sawatsky, Adam P., Halvorsen, Andrew J., Daniels, Paul R., Bonnes, Sara L., Issa, Meltiady, Ratelle, John T., Stephenson, Christopher R., Beckman, Thomas J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Taylor & Francis 01.01.2020; Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: Adult; Clinical Competence; Female; General internal medicine; Goals; graduate medical education; Humans; Internship and Residency - organization & administration; Internship and Residency - standards; Learning; learning goals; learning objectives; Male; Prospective Studies; self-directed learning; self-regulated learning; Young Adult; graduate medical education; self-directed learning; learning objectives; learning goals; General internal medicine; self-regulated learning
• ISSN: 1087-2981; 1087-2981
• DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1714198

Background: Residents are expected to develop the skills to set learning goals. Setting learning goals is part of self-regulated learning, setting the foundation for creating a learning plan, deploying learning strategies, and assessing their progress to those goals. While effective goal setting is essential to resident self-regulated learning, residents struggle with setting learning goals and desire faculty assistance with goal setting. Objective: We aimed to characterize the topics and quality of residents' rotation-specific learning goals. Design: We conducted a prospective study of 153 internal medicine residents, assessing 455 learning goals for general medicine inpatient rotations. We coded learning goal themes, competencies, and learning domains, and assessed quality using the validated Learning Goal Scoring Rubric. We compared topic categories, competencies, learning domains, and quality between the first and second months of postgraduate (PGY)-1 residents and between PGY-1 and PGY-3 residents. We assessed factors associated with learning goal completion. Results: The overall response rate was 80%. The top three learning goal categories were patient management, specific diseases related to general medicine, and teaching skills. There were no changes in learning goal characteristics between PGY-1 months (p ≥ 0.04). There were differences between PGY-1 and PGY-3 residents' learning goals in patient management (28% vs 6%; p < .001), specific disease conditions (19% vs 3%; p < .001), and teaching skills (2% vs 56%; p < .001). There was no difference in learning goal quality between PGY-1 months (1.63 vs. 1.67; p = 0.82). The PGY-3 learning goals were of higher quality than PGY-1 learning goals for the 'specific goal' item (1.38 vs. 0.98, p = 0.005), but not for other items or overall (all p ≥ 0.02). Residents reported 85% (297/347) learning goal completion. Conclusions: Resident rotation-specific learning goals reflect a broad array of topics. Residents' learning goal quality was low and residents may benefit from guidance to support residents' learning goals.