A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China

•A significant reduction in psychological impact 4 weeks after COVID outbreak.•The mean scores of respondents in both surveys were above PTSD cut-offs.•Female gender, physical symptoms associated with a higher psychological impact.•Hand hygiene, mask-wearing & confidence in doctors reduced psych...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain, behavior, and immunity Vol. 87; pp. 40 - 48
Main Authors Wang, Cuiyan, Pan, Riyu, Wan, Xiaoyang, Tan, Yilin, Xu, Linkang, McIntyre, Roger S., Choo, Faith N., Tran, Bach, Ho, Roger, Sharma, Vijay K., Ho, Cyrus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•A significant reduction in psychological impact 4 weeks after COVID outbreak.•The mean scores of respondents in both surveys were above PTSD cut-offs.•Female gender, physical symptoms associated with a higher psychological impact.•Hand hygiene, mask-wearing & confidence in doctors reduced psychological impact.•Online trauma-focused psychotherapy may be helpful to public during COVID-19. In addition to being a public physical health emergency, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected global mental health, as evidenced by panic-buying worldwide as cases soared. Little is known about changes in levels of psychological impact, stress, anxiety and depression during this pandemic. This longitudinal study surveyed the general population twice - during the initial outbreak, and the epidemic's peak four weeks later, surveying demographics, symptoms, knowledge, concerns, and precautionary measures against COVID-19. There were 1738 respondents from 190 Chinese cities (1210 first-survey respondents, 861 s-survey respondents; 333 respondents participated in both). Psychological impact and mental health status were assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), respectively. IES-R measures PTSD symptoms in survivorship after an event. DASS -21 is based on tripartite model of psychopathology that comprise a general distress construct with distinct characteristics. This study found that there was a statistically significant longitudinal reduction in mean IES-R scores (from 32.98 to 30.76, p < 0.01) after 4 weeks. Nevertheless, the mean IES-R score of the first- and second-survey respondents were above the cut-off scores (>24) for PTSD symptoms, suggesting that the reduction in scores was not clinically significant. During the initial evaluation, moderate-to-severe stress, anxiety and depression were noted in 8.1%, 28.8% and 16.5%, respectively and there were no significant longitudinal changes in stress, anxiety and depression levels (p > 0.05). Protective factors included high level of confidence in doctors, perceived survival likelihood and low risk of contracting COVID-19, satisfaction with health information, personal precautionary measures. As countries around the world brace for an escalation in cases, Governments should focus on effective methods of disseminating unbiased COVID-19 knowledge, teaching correct containment methods, ensuring availability of essential services/commodities, and providing sufficient financial support.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0889-1591
1090-2139
1090-2139
DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.028