Internal models of upper limb prosthesis users when grasping and lifting a fragile object with their prosthetic limb

• Published in: Experimental brain research Vol. 232; no. 12; pp. 3785 - 3795
• Main Authors: Lum, Peter S., Black, Iian, Holley, Rahsaan J., Barth, Jessica, Dromerick, Alexander W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2014; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Amputation; Arm - physiology; Artificial Limbs; Biological and medical sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Brain research; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hand Strength - physiology; Humans; Lifting; Lifting and carrying; Middle Aged; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration; Neurology; Neurosciences; Physiological aspects; Prostheses; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Research Article; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs; Young Adult; United States; United States > US; Internal model; Prosthesis; Motor control; Grasp; Amputation; Upper limb; Models
• ISSN: 0014-4819; 1432-1106
• DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4071-1

Internal models allow unimpaired individuals to appropriately scale grip force when grasping and lifting familiar objects. In prosthesis users, the internal model must adapt to the characteristics of the prosthetic devices and reduced sensory feedback. We studied the internal models of 11 amputees and eight unimpaired controls when grasping and lifting a fragile object. When the object was modified from a rigid to fragile state, both subject groups adapted appropriately by significantly reducing grasp force on the first trial with the fragile object compared to the rigid object ( p  < 0.020). There was a wide range of performance skill illustrated by amputee subjects when lifting the fragile object in 10 repeated trials. One subject, using a voluntary close device, never broke the object, four subjects broke the fragile device on every attempt and seven others failed on their initial attempts, but improved over the repeated trials. Amputees decreased their grip forces 51 ± 7 % from the first to the last trial ( p  < 0.001), indicating a practice effect. However, amputees used much higher levels of force than controls throughout the testing ( p  < 0.015). Amputees with better performance on the Box and Blocks test used lower grip force levels ( p  = 0.006) and had more successful lifts of the fragile object ( p  = 0.002). In summary, amputees do employ internal models when picking up objects; however, the accuracy of these models is poor and grip force modulation is significantly impaired. Further studies could examine the alternative sensory modalities and training parameters that best promote internal model formation.